Search Results for "Gram Panchayat election"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Gram Panchayat election"

360 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 360 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notification for Gram Panchayats Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Rotation Policy. Failure to Follow Section 161 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 and Rule 3 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1997 Rendered the Impugned List Invalid.

3 Jul 2023

The petitioners, Durgappa and Sharanamma, were Presidents of Bappur Gram Panchayat and Tidigol Gram Panchayat respectively. They filed a writ petition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone. Appellants convicted under Section 307 read with 34 IPC for assaulting victim due to Facebook dispute settlement, but acquitted of conspiracy and harbouring.

30 Oct 2018

The appellants, original accused nos.1 to 3, were convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.314 of 2014 for the of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Nomination of Non-OBC Members to Municipal Council. Holds That Section 47 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 Does Not Require Nominated Members to Belong to OBC Category.

4 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Jagdish Samanpelliwar, filed four writ petitions challenging the nomination of respondents 4 in each petition as members of the Kinwat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Motion signed by only 9 members instead of the required 10, and notice period of 15 days not provided.

28 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Smt. Roopa, was the President of Honnenahalli Gram Panchayat. The respondents 5 to 14, who were members of the Panchayat, moved a no-c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination of Disqualified Candidate in Gram Panchayat Elections. Returning Officer Failed to Consider Disqualification Order Passed by Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division.

31 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Amol Sahebrao Solanke, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the acceptance of the nomination ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notice for President of Gram Panchayat Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Rule 3(1A) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the election intimation notice dated 7.2.2014 fixing election on 17.2.2014 violated the mandatory requirement of at least 15 days' notice.

20 Feb 2014

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the election intimation notice dated 7....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

8 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Purshottam Tonpe, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Mahakal. Subsequently, he contested and won election to the Agriculture P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Fourth Child Born After Cut-off Date Despite Child's Death. The birth of a live child after the cut-off date constitutes an increase in the number of children under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the subsequent death of the child does not attract the protection of the first proviso.

13 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Patiram @ Ratiraj Shirbhiye, was elected as Member and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wadala on 28-8-2005. Respondent No.3, Go...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds State Election Commission's Power to Reschedule Panchayat Elections in Flood-Affected Areas. The Court held that the Election Commission's powers under Article 243-K are wide enough to postpone elections due to natural calamity to ensure free and fair elections.

28 Sep 2005

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the directions issued by the State Election Commissio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)