Search Results for "Departmental Examination"

697 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 697 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Police Personnel for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Inquiry conducted without proper opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and based on inadmissible evidence held unsustainable.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by police personnel (three police constables and one assistant sub-inspector) challenging disciplinary...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Workman's Right to Advocate in Domestic Enquiry. Management Representative with HR Background and Enquiry Experience Deemed Legally Trained Mind, Justifying Workman's Right to Legal Representation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a challenge by the employer, The Indian Express (P) Ltd and its officers, against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane dated 9 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Proceedings in Murder Conspiracy Case — Prima Facie Case of Fabricated Alibi Established. Police Officers Allegedly Created Bogus Excise Case to Shield Murder Accused, High Court Erred in Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, Om Prakash Yadav, against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had quashed cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Zone of Consideration for Scheduled Tribes Promotion in Electricity Department — Seniority-Based Zone of Consideration Upheld as Valid Methodology for Promotion from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by eight petitioners who were working as Junior Engineers in the Electricity Department of the Governme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Bank Officer in State Bank of India Disciplinary Case. Penalty of Removal from Service under Rule 67(i) of State Bank of India Officers Service Rules Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Charges of Irregularities as Branch Manager.

The petitioner, Gopal Vajani, was employed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) since 1978, rising from Clerk-cum-typist to Scale-III officer. He was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Remands Disproportionate Punishment Case to Industrial Court for Fresh Determination of Quantum. Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment Under MRTU & PULP Act Upheld, but Remand Ordered for Proper Application of Proportionality Principle.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, which had set aside the punishment of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Disproportionate Punishment. Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment Under MRTU and PULP Act Upheld — Permanent Stoppage of Increments for Outraging Modesty Found Disproportionate.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, which had set aside the punishment of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Petition for Higher Pay Scale and Pensionary Benefits Despite Not Passing Departmental Examination. Exemption Granted Under Government Resolutions for Employees Above 45 Years of Age Cannot Be Ignored for Grant of Benefits.

The petitioner, Ramesh s/o Channapa Kompalli, was appointed as a Junior Clerk in the office of respondent No.4 on 4th March, 1985 and later promoted t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as demand of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Deepak Ramgirwar and Vinayak Wakhre, were convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 161 read with Section 34 o...