Search Results for "Companies Act 1956 Section 111"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Companies Act 1956 Section 111"

126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ONGC Against Upholding of Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Interpretation of Contract Terms and Findings of Fact by Arbitral Tribunal Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Apr 2026

The case arises from a commercial arbitration appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment of a Single Judge of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

5 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Alternative Remedy of Appeal Under Section 17(7) Available. Petitioners, as tenants of secured asset, cannot bypass statutory appellate remedy by invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

8 Aug 2017

The petitioners, who were tenants of a property that was a secured asset of the respondent HDB Financial Services Ltd., filed securitisation applicati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

8 Aug 2016

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

8 Jun 2016

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories. The court held that a non-signatory can be bound by an arbitration agreement if there is a direct relationship with the signatory and the transaction, and that enforcement cannot be refused on grounds of public policy unless the award is contrary to the fundamental policy of Indian law.

18 Apr 2016

The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an International Arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Hotel Sale Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.1.88 crore with interest for breach of contract, rejecting grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Sahara Hospitality Limited (formerly Batra Hospitality Private Limited), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging IRDA's Rejection of Insurance Broker License Transfer. Transfer of Corporate Agency License Requires Prior Approval Under Insurance Act, 1938 and IRDA Regulations.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioners, including Wills India Insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Solid Waste Management Project — Acquisition for Public Purpose Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the project aimed at scientific disposal of solid waste is a public purpose and the invocation of urgency clause under Section 17 was justified.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by various landowners and a company challenging the acquisition of their land by the State of Maharash...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)