Search Results for "Coal India Limited"

701 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 701 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Private Company and Directors in Coal Scam Case, Upholds CBI Investigation. Post-Facto Consent Under Section 6 of DSPE Act Valid for Public Servants Not Named in FIR, Private Individuals Lack Locus to Challenge Investigation.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the Allahabad High Court's order upholding CBI investigation in a coal scam case. The case arose from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Grand-Daughter's Employment Claim Under R&R Policy 2008 for Land Acquisition by Western Coal Fields Ltd. — Inclusive Definition of 'Family' Includes Other Relatives

The petitioners, Namdeo (land owner) and his grand-daughter Sonu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking employm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Rejection in Coal Transportation Contract. Joint Venture's Bid Rejected for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Experience Condition.

The petitioners, a joint venture between M/s. B. Himmatlal Agrawal and M/s. Puniya Coal Roadlines, challenged the rejection of their bid by Western Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010068412019_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010479002008_1

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Under Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act. Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Invoking Section 33C(2) and Cannot Be Decided as Incidental Issue.

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Haryana Utilities Against APTEL Order on Tariff Revision for Adani Power. Court upholds CERC's power to grant compensatory tariff under Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 due to change in law and force majeure events.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 3rd November 2020, which dismissed the appeal filed ...