Search Results for "Civil suit"

Trending :

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint ...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Eviction Case and Remands to Trial ...
Supreme Court Quashes Charge Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to ...
Supreme Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Dismissal in Specific Performance Suit Due to ...
Supreme Court Addresses Systemic Delays in Legal Aid Filing Through Committee Fo...

Search Results for "Civil suit"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismissed Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorised Construction — Held Illegality Cannot Be Cured. The High Court ruled that a petitioner cannot seek defense on grounds of illiteracy for unauthorized construction — Reaffirmed the settled principle of law that illegality remains incurable.

25 Feb 2025

High Court found no evidence of ownership and held that illegality cannot be cured — Refused to grant any reliefs sought by the petitioner. Peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismissed Writ Petition Challenging Unilateral Deemed Conveyance Order Passed Under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

24 Feb 2025

Deemed Conveyance – Competent Authority’s Quasi-Judicial Jurisdiction – Civil Suit for Title and Ownership Disputes – No Interference Under Ar...

High Court

Executing Court failed to exercise jurisdiction under Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – High Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter for proper execution of the decree.

20 Feb 2025

The Executing Court has a duty to exercise jurisdiction under Section 51 CPC to determine all questions relating to decree execution, including the id...

High Court

Executing Court failed to exercise jurisdiction under Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – High Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter for proper execution of the decree.

20 Feb 2025

The Executing Court has a duty to exercise jurisdiction under Section 51 CPC to determine all questions relating to decree execution, including the id...

High Court

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA – Rejection of Application by Competent Authority Set Aside. High Court of Bombay – Writ Petition under Article 226 – Challenge to Rejection of Deemed Conveyance – Developer’s Delay in Redevelopment Not a Justification – Statutory Rights under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 Upheld – Competent Authority Directed to Issue Conveyance Certificate

18 Feb 2025

Constitution of India, Article 226 – Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management, and Transfer) Act, ...

Supreme Court

Civil Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession — Res Judicata, Limitation, and Representative Suit Discussed — Supreme Court Set Aside High Court’s Decree and Dismissed the Suit.

14 Feb 2025

A suit filed in a representative capacity cannot override the conclusive effect of a decree already attained finality, and res judicata shall bar any ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashed Trial Court’s Order Denying Amendment of Plea in Suit for Pre-emption Rights. Court Held That the Amendment Was Merely Clarificatory and Did Not Change the Nature of the Suit

7 Feb 2025

Constitution of India (COI) – Article 227 – Power of Superintendence of High Court – Court held that interference under Article 227 is justified...

High Court

Deemed Conveyance Under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (MOFA) — Civil Court Jurisdiction in Title Disputes — Quasi-Judicial Authority’s Scope — Premature Application for Deemed Conveyance

7 Feb 2025

Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 — Writ Jurisdiction — Civil Court’s Exclusive Authority on Title Disputes Maharashtra Ownership Fla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR and Charge-Sheet Against Hospital Directors — Purely Civil Dispute With No Criminality Involved Tagline: No Ingredients of Cheating Established — Criminal Proceedings Termed an Abuse of Law Headnote: Acts and Sections Discussed: Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 (Writ Jurisdiction) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (Inherent Powers of High Court) Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 418 (Cheating With Knowledge), Section 420 (Cheating and Dishonest Inducement), Section 34 (Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention) Keywords:Writ Jurisdiction — Quashing of FIR — Commercial Transaction — Civil Suit — Non-Payment of Dues — Abuse of Process — No Criminal Offence Nature of the Litigation:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR and charge-sheet. Petitioners’ Relief Sought:Quashing of FIR No.98 of 2020 lodged at Bhosari Police Station and the charge-sheet arising from it. Reason for Filing the Case:Allegations of non-payment of professional dues and financial aid advanced to the hospital. Prior Decisions:Special Civil Suit No.1161 of 2018 filed by the complainant for recovery of Rs.53,11,652/- was pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. Issues:Whether the dispute between the parties was of a civil or criminal nature, and whether criminal proceedings were maintainable alongside a pending civil suit. Submissions/Arguments:(a) Petitioners: FIR related to events preceding their control of the hospital — No criminal intention or inducement established — Civil suit already instituted for the same financial claims. (b) Respondents: Civil and criminal proceedings can proceed simultaneously — Alleged WhatsApp messages demonstrated promises to clear dues. Decision:FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deemed an abuse of process of law. Ratio:No criminal offence was made out against the petitioners — Allegations of non-payment related to a period before the petitioners took control of the hospital — Civil remedy already sought by the complainant — No dishonest inducement proven as required under Sections 415 and 420 of IPC. Relevant Paragraphs:Paras 9, 10, and 11 of the judgment outline the court’s rationale for quashing the FIR and charge-sheet.

4 Feb 2025

FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deem...

Supreme Court

Amendment in Civil Suit Permissible Due to Continuous Cause of Action, Even Without Section 80 Notice – Supreme Court.

9 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision permitting the amendment, observing: The debarment orders stemmed from a continuous chain of eve...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)