Search Results for "BDA Layout Dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "BDA Layout Dispute"

129 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute — Appellants Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. The trial court's order granting temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was upheld as the respondents demonstrated possession and the appellants' remedy lay in filing a counterclaim.

22 Jul 2025

The appellants, Smt. A.Y. Sathyavathi, Sri. Sagar Gowda, and Smt. Anushka, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

18 Jun 2024

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

High Court

KAHC020110942015_1

13 Dec 2023

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Withdrawal Case — State Government's Endorsements Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Quashed. Land Vests in State Once Possession Taken and Compensation Paid; Government Cannot Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48.

22 May 2023

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Additional Land Acquisition Officer against an order of a l...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes RERA Authority's Refund Order Against Builder for Lack of Jurisdiction as Project Was Completed Before RERA Act Came Into Force. The Court held that the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 applies only to ongoing projects where completion certificate is not issued, and since partial occupancy certificate was issued prior to the Act, the complaint was not maintainable and the order was without jurisdiction.

2 Jan 2023

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by M/s Provident Housing Limited, a real estate deve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Permission for Alteration of Open Spaces in Housing Project — Open Spaces Sanctioned in Approved Layout Cannot Be Reduced Under Guise of Surplus Area. The Court held that purchasers of plots have a right to the open spaces as shown in the approved layout, and any deviation requires fresh approval and consent of all affected parties.

30 Sep 2022

The petitioners, residents and plot owners of the project 'Aldeia de Goa' at Bambolim, challenged the permission/NOC dated 11.12.2020 granted by the D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession and Title Against Society and Purchaser. The court held that the plaintiff cannot seek a declaration without establishing his own title, and that mere filing of a suit does not prove possession.

10 Mar 2015

The appellant, S. Nanjappa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession and Title Against Society and Transferee. The court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a suit for declaration and injunction, as the plaintiff did not produce the will or power of attorney to establish ownership or possession.

10 Mar 2015

The appellant, S. Nanjappa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Appellant Institution Succeeds in Proving Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. The respondent failed to establish his employment with the appellant, leading to dismissal of the suit for declaration and injunction.

1 Mar 2013

The appellant, The Chairman The State Government Employees Shikshana Sangha, Laxmi Complex, Neeligin Road, Hubli, represented by its Principal, filed ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)