Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1515 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1515 result(s)

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute Between Parties Arbitration Petition Allowed Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Procedural Irregularities

3 Feb 2026

The High Court allowed an arbitration petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute -- The Court found that the arbitral tribunal co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Infrastructure Facility Agreement Dispute — Disputes Referable to Arbitration Despite Allegations of Repudiation. The court held that issues of repudiation and limitation are for the arbitral tribunal to decide under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Jun 2022

The applicant, Priya Malay Sheth, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitral Tribunal Order Imposing Condition on Petitioner to Deposit Amount for Filing Counterclaim. The court held that the Arbitral Tribunal has no power under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to impose such a condition, as Section 23 does not confer any such power.

28 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Ultra Entertainment Solutions Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Commercial Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act — Petitioner Contends Award Ignores Contractual Back-to-Back Payment Clause. Award of Rs.25.27 Crore Granted by Arbitrator Based on Letter Dated 15 November 2019 is Alleged to be Perverse and Patently Illegal, Ignoring That Payments Were Contingent on Receipts from Rural Development Department.

5 Dec 2025

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Arbitral Award dated 11 July 2024. The Arbitral...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Coal Handling Services. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that allegations of fraud were not serious enough to render dispute non-arbitrable and rejects challenge to award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Nov 2023

The case involves a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Maharashtra Power Generation Company Ltd. (Petitioner) seeking to set aside an arbitral a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2013

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Dispute Between Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd. and State of Maharashtra. Court holds that disputes arising from a contract containing an arbitration clause are arbitrable and appoints arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)