Search Results for "Section 20(4)"

1170 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1170 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Delay — Promise to Marry Broken Does Not Constitute Rape Under Section 376 IPC When Relationship Was Consensual and Long-Standing

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Lalu Yadav against the order of the Allahabad High Court dismissing his writ petition seeking quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Applicant in Cheating and Forgery Case — Investigation Complete, No Custodial Interrogation Required. Pre-arrest bail allowed under Section 438 CrPC for offences under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 BNS as investigation complete and applicant cooperated.

The applicant, Haribhau Dnyandev Chemte, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking pre-arrest bail in co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Demand Against Ex-Director for Company Dues — No Personal Liability Without Statutory Provision. Section 142(1)(c)(ii) of Customs Act, 1962 does not authorise recovery from a former director who ceased to be associated with the company before the demand.

The petitioner, Purshottam Das Gupta, an 86-year-old senior citizen, was formerly a director of Sujata Verbatim Limited (later renamed PDG Infotech Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Resignation Prior to Cheque Issuance and Absence of Specific Averments Under Section 141 NI Act Lead to Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicant, Vijay Khairatilal Bhatia, was accused No. 5 in a criminal complaint filed by Bhagirath Chandulal Arya (respondent No. 1) under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Director's Application to Quash Process in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations Under Section 141 NI Act. Director Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable Without Averment of Being in Charge of Business Conduct.

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Section 141 NI Act requires specific averment that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business at the time of offence.

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act Requires Specific Averments of Role in Company Affairs.

The case involves a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 1 (complainant) under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments A...