Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Applicant in Cheating and Forgery Case — Investigation Complete, No Custodial Interrogation Required. Pre-arrest bail allowed under Section 438 CrPC for offences under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 BNS as investigation complete and applicant cooperated.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Haribhau Dnyandev Chemte, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.152 of 2025 registered at Vimantal Police Station, Pune, for offences punishable under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, and 340 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). The case was lodged by the first informant, who intervened through counsel. The applicant was represented by Mr. S. B. Talekar, while the State was represented by APP Mr. A. R. Metkari, and the first informant by Senior Counsel Mr. Manoj Mohite. The court heard all parties and considered the submissions. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that the investigation was complete and the applicant had cooperated with the investigating agency, and therefore no custodial interrogation was required. The State and the first informant opposed the application, but the court found that the investigation had progressed to a stage where custodial interrogation was not necessary. The court noted that the applicant had been cooperating and that the investigation was complete. Consequently, the court allowed the application and granted pre-arrest bail to the applicant, subject to certain conditions. The judgment was delivered by Justice Madhav J. Jamdar on 16th September 2025.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Pre-arrest bail granted where investigation is complete and no custodial interrogation is required - The applicant sought pre-arrest bail in a case involving cheating and forgery; the court held that since the investigation was complete and the applicant had cooperated, custodial interrogation was not necessary, and thus pre-arrest bail was granted (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.152 of 2025 for offences under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, given that the investigation is complete and the applicant has cooperated.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. The applicant is granted pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.152 of 2025 registered with Vimantal Police Station, Pune, for offences under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, subject to conditions.

Law Points

  • Pre-arrest bail
  • Anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNSS
  • Cheating
  • Forgery
  • Criminal conspiracy
  • Investigation complete
  • No custodial interrogation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 67

Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1516 of 2025

2025-09-16

Madhav J. Jamdar

2025:BHC-AS:38530

Mr. S. B. Talekar, Ms. Madhavi Ayyappan, Mr. Yogesh Morey, Mr. A. R. Metkari, Mr. Manoj Mohite, Mr. Amit Jajoo, Mr. Niray Parmar, Mr. Aryan Deshmukh, Mr. Kushal Mor, Mr. Nirav Parmar, Mr. Sachin Dhamane

Haribhau Dnyandev Chemte

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal for pre-arrest bail

Remedy Sought

Pre-arrest bail under Section 438 CrPC

Filing Reason

Applicant apprehended arrest in connection with C.R. No.152 of 2025 for offences under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 BNS

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to pre-arrest bail given the nature of offences and stage of investigation.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel argued that investigation is complete and applicant has cooperated, so no custodial interrogation is required. State and first informant opposed the application.

Ratio Decidendi

Pre-arrest bail can be granted when the investigation is complete and the applicant has cooperated, as custodial interrogation is not necessary.

Judgment Excerpts

This application is filed seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.152 of 2025 registered with Vimantal Police Station, Pune for the offence punishable under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Heard Mr. Talekar, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants, Mr. Metkari, learned APP appearing for the Respondent No.1-State and Mr. Mohite, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Intervenor/First Informant.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1516 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay seeking pre-arrest bail. The court heard the applicant, the State, and the first informant, and allowed the application on 16th September 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 246, 318, 337, 339, 340
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 438
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeals in Voluntary Retirement and Disciplinary Action Case. Employee's voluntary retirement deemed accepted as bank failed to refuse notice within prescribed period under Regulation 29 of UCO Bank (Employees') Pension...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Special Committee to Continue Adjudicating Pending Applications in Land Allotment Dispute - Applications Classified for Resolution by Special Committee or Court Based on Nature of Grievances. Special Committee Appointed Under Ar...