Search Results for "government tender"

1955 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1955 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Trust to Sell Land for Temple Development Under Section 36(1)(a) of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958. Joint Charity Commissioner's Rejection Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind.

The Petitioner, a registered charitable trust under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958, sought permission under Section 36(1)(a) of the Act to se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution Failed to Establish Demand and Acceptance of Illegal Gratification Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Sindhudurg at Oros, acquitting the respondent, Shridhar Madhavrao Murti, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Anti-Arbitration Injunction in Facilitation Deed Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Has Competence to Decide Validity of Underlying Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (Sony) and World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited (WSG) concerni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Suit Against Bank for Demurrage Charges — Bank Not Owner Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. Suit Against Bank Barred by Limitation as Goods Sold in 1979 and Suit Filed in 1982.

The plaintiff, Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay (BPT), filed a suit against defendant No.1 (M/s. South Iron & Steel Co.) and defendant No.2 (Un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Naval Dockyard Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on extra work and escalation claims as plausible and not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from a ...