Bombay High Court Allows Trust to Sell Land for Temple Development Under Section 36(1)(a) of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958. Joint Charity Commissioner's Rejection Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, a registered charitable trust under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958, sought permission under Section 36(1)(a) of the Act to sell its land bearing Gat No.798 admeasuring 1.15 hectares in village Peth, Taluka Walwa, District Sangli. The trust intended to use the sale proceeds for the development of its temple, including renovation, construction of a 'bhakta nivas' (devotees' accommodation), and a marriage hall. The trust filed Application No. 25 of 2019 before the Joint Charity Commissioner, Kolhapur, who rejected the application by order dated 15.11.2021. Aggrieved, the trust filed the present Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court. The court examined the impugned order and found that the Joint Charity Commissioner had not applied his mind to the trust's resolution and the specific purposes for which the sale proceeds were to be utilized. The court noted that the rejection was mechanical and without proper consideration of the trust's needs. The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the Joint Charity Commissioner to reconsider the application afresh, taking into account the trust's proposal and the necessity of the sale for the development of the temple.

Headnote

A) Trust Law - Permission to Sell Trust Property - Section 36(1)(a) Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958 - The trust sought permission to sell land to raise funds for temple renovation, construction of 'bhakta nivas' and marriage hall. The Joint Charity Commissioner rejected the application without considering the trust's needs and the proposed use of sale proceeds. Held that the Commissioner must apply mind to the purpose and necessity of sale, and not reject mechanically. (Paras 1-4)

B) Administrative Law - Non-Application of Mind - Section 36(1)(a) Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958 - The impugned order was passed without proper consideration of the trust's resolution and the intended development. The court found the rejection arbitrary and set it aside, directing reconsideration. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Joint Charity Commissioner erred in rejecting the trust's application under Section 36(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958 for permission to sell trust land for temple development.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the Writ Petition, quashed the impugned order dated 15.11.2021, and directed the Joint Charity Commissioner to reconsider Application No. 25 of 2019 afresh in accordance with law, taking into account the trust's resolution and the proposed use of sale proceeds.

Law Points

  • Section 36(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
  • 1958
  • permission to sell trust property
  • non-application of mind by Charity Commissioner
  • trust's power to alienate property for development purposes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (07) 89

WRIT PETITION NO. 1346 OF 2022

2022-07-14

MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

Dr. Uday P. Warunjikar a/w. Ms. Vaishnavi M. Gujarathi for the Petitioner, Mr. A.B. Kadam, AGP for the Respondent - State

Shri. Ramchandra Dev, Peth, a trust registered under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, through its trustee Rajaram Shankar Gaikwad

The Ld. Joint Charity Commissioner, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging the order of Joint Charity Commissioner rejecting application for permission to sell trust property.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 15.11.2021 and direction to grant permission to sell land.

Filing Reason

The Joint Charity Commissioner rejected the trust's application under Section 36(1)(a) for permission to sell land for temple development.

Previous Decisions

Application No. 25 of 2019 rejected by Joint Charity Commissioner on 15.11.2021.

Issues

Whether the Joint Charity Commissioner's order rejecting permission to sell trust property under Section 36(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958 was valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the sale was necessary for temple development and the Commissioner did not apply mind. Respondent argued that the order was passed after due process of law.

Ratio Decidendi

The Joint Charity Commissioner must apply his mind to the purpose and necessity of the sale of trust property under Section 36(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958, and cannot reject the application mechanically without considering the trust's resolution and the intended development.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner is challenging the Order dated 15.11.2021 passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Kolhapur under the provisions of section 36(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Pubic Trusts Act, 1958 while rejecting Application No. 25 of 2019 for seeking permission to sell property bearing Gat No.798 admeasuring 1.15 hectors / Ares situated in village Peth, taluka Walva, District Sangli belonging to the Petitioner. Respondent has argued that the impugned order has been passed after following the due process of law.

Procedural History

The trust filed Application No. 25 of 2019 before the Joint Charity Commissioner, Kolhapur under Section 36(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958 seeking permission to sell land. The application was rejected on 15.11.2021. The trust then filed the present Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1958: 36(1)(a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act in Dispute Between LIC and NIC Over Rent Arrears and Damages. The court upheld the eviction of NIC from LIC's premises under Section 5 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Conviction Under Dowry Prohibition Act — Demand for Money Not Proven as Dowry Demand. Court holds that demand for money for digging well and agricultural expenses, without evidence of demand in connection wit...