Search Results for "Trial Fairness"

1019 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1019 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Student-Driver Where Blood Alcohol Concentration Exceeded Statutory Limit by 0.1 mg. Court Applied Operational Tolerance Margin of Breath Analyser and De Minimis Principle Under Section 33 BNS 2023 to Prevent Abuse of Process.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Kerala Hears Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007. Detenue's Wife Challenges Detention Order Dated 23.04.2026 Alleging Improper Known Rowdy Classification and Delay Snapping Live Link.

The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam considered a writ petition (criminal) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the wife of detenu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Co-owner's Title in Ancestral Property Despite Consolidation Officer's Order Expunging Name. Section 49 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 Does Not Confer Power to Divest Pre-existing Tenure Holder's Ownership Rights.

The case concerns a dispute over ancestral land in village Mustafabad, Haridwar, originally owned by Angat, who had three sons: Ramji Lal, Khushi Ram,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene.

The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London ...