Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1918 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1918 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Discharge Accused in Fake Currency Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Involvement Found Sufficient for Trial Under Sections 489B and 489C IPC.

The appellant, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, was implicated in a case involving the possession and sale of counterfeit Saudi Arabian Riyal currency ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant's Title and Possession Over Land Not Extinguished by Acquisition Proceedings. The court held that the appellant had locus standi to challenge the acquisition and that the delay was not fatal as possession continued.

The appellant, Sri V Sreenivasaiah, filed a writ appeal against the order dated 25.02.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 2228/2022, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Trustees for Mismanagement of Public Trust. Trustees Failed to Maintain Accounts and Misappropriated Trust Funds, Violating Sections 41A, 41D, 50 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

The case involves two writ petitions filed against the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur, dated 30th June 2003, removing the trustees of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of suit property bearing R.S. No. 165/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Suit for Recovery of Unpaid Amounts and Interest in Construction Contract Dispute. Holds that Delayed Payments Attract Interest Under Section 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Excess Recovery from Mobilisation Advance Must Be Refunded.

The plaintiff, M/s Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the Maharashtra State Police Housing & Welfare Corporation Ltd. for recovery...