KAHC010645132024_1
19 Dec 2025The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...
Search Results for "Execution Proceedings"
6366 result(s) found
Found 6366 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Partial Arbitral Award Upholding Initialled Joint Executing Agreement as Valid Arbitration Agreement. Initialling and Conduct Found to Evidence Mutual Assent, Establishing Binding Contract Under Section 7, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
3 Nov 2025The dispute arose from a consortium formed by M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (M3), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (P...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order in Execution Proceedings for Overreaching Earlier Decree — Bailiff Directed to Execute Decree as Per Original Terms Without Deviation. The court held that the executing court cannot modify the decree or add conditions not found in the decree, and the impugned order was set aside under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
14 Aug 2012The petitioners, Prabhakar Ramchandra Desai and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Injunction Decree — Judgment Debtor Cannot Challenge Decree Validity in Execution Proceedings Under Section 47 CPC After 11 Years. The court held that objections under Section 47 CPC are limited to executability and cannot be used to re-agitate issues already decided in the suit.
21 Jun 2005The case arose from Regular Civil Suit No. 711 of 1981 filed by the respondents (decree holders) against the petitioners (judgment debtors) seeking a ...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Conditional Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Eviction Suit. Court upholds condition of depositing arrears of rent as a valid exercise of discretion under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC.
27 Jun 2006The petitioners, Hargovindas Shivlal & Co. and others, were lessees of an open plot of land in Chembur, Mumbai. They had entered into a leave and lice...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Possession Under Specific Performance Decree — Executing Court Erred in Rejecting Application for Possession After Sale Deed Execution. The Court held that once a sale deed is executed in execution of a decree for specific performance, the decree-holder is entitled to possession under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC, and the Executing Court cannot go behind the decree.
9 Jul 2014The petitioner, Ramchandra Guja Rewatkar, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Executing Court that rejected his application for possessi...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation and Rejection of Highest Bid in Municipal Contract for Construction of Shopping Complex. Court holds that the Municipal Council's decision to cancel the tender and reject the highest bid was arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, as the bidder was not given an opportunity to explain the alleged discrepancy in the bid document.
6 May 2022The petitioner, Khilari Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of the Osmanabad Municipal Council (Respondent No. 5) to cancel the tender p...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute — Maintainability Upheld as Dispute Not Between Landlord and Tenant. The Court distinguished the Supreme Court's ruling in Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil, holding that the bar on Letters Patent Appeals under Article 227 applies only to landlord-tenant disputes under the Rent Control Act, 1999.
28 Oct 2010The appellant, Ramchandra Krushnarao Pitale, an 87-year-old pensioner, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.6.2009 pa...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Execution Proceedings in Mortgage Suit — Decree Holder's Assignee Need Not Prove Legal Heirship Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC. The Court Held That the Executing Court Cannot Go Behind the Decree to Examine the Validity of Assignment.
1 Oct 2013The present Civil Revision Application arises from execution proceedings in a mortgage suit. The original decree holder, Kalubai, obtained a decree an...
- 147
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.
25 Feb 2015The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...
- 137
