High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Decides Multiple Letters Patent Appeals. The Decision Involves First Appeals and Related Disputes.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Cooperative Bank"
1525 result(s) found
Found 1525 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
21 Mar 2013Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...
- 27
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Holds that Taking Insurance Policy for Commercial Premises is for Commercial Purpose, Excluding Complainant from Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court ruled that a commercial entity taking fire insurance policy for its business premises is not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, as the policy is taken for commercial purpose.
13 Apr 2023The present appeals by special leave assail the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 2004 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Na...
- 172
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Complainant Bank, Restores Criminal Proceedings Quashed by High Court. High Court Erred in Quashing Charge-Sheet Solely Because Other Alleged Co-Accused Were Not Arraigned; Section 319 CrPC Provides Remedy to Array Additional Accused During Trial.
9 Dec 2021The appellant, M/s Suvarna Cooperative Bank Ltd, filed a complaint under Section 200 CrPC before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalo...
- 348
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process for Forgery Against Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Absence of Allegation of Making False Document. Court holds that dishonour of cheque alone does not constitute forgery under Section 467 IPC without proof of making false document.
27 Sep 2012The petitioner, Shaikh Noor Shaikh Nanhu, was original accused no.4 in Regular Criminal Case No. 65/2000 pending before the Judicial Magistrate (F.C.)...
- 85
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Chairman of Co-operative Society in KPID Act Case — Co-operative Society Not a Financial Establishment Under KPID Act. The court held that a co-operative society registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 is excluded from the definition of 'financial establishment' under the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2004, and therefore proceedings under the KPID Act are not maintainable.
20 Jun 2018The petitioner, Anand Balkrishna Appugol, was the Chairman of Shree Krantiveer Sangolli Rayanna Co-operative Society Limited, a co-operative society r...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Government Resolutions Granting Protection to Employees with False Tribe Certificates. Petitioners Argue That Such Resolutions Violate Constitutional Provisions and Statutory Mandate Regarding Withdrawal of Benefits Obtained Through False Certificates.
11 Nov 2014The petitioner, an advocate and president of the Tribal Rights Protection Committee, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging th...
- 43
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Issuing Regular Summons in Summary Suit — Directs Fresh Summons Under Form No.4 CPC. Court Holds That in a Summary Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC, the Trial Court Must Issue Summons in Form No.4 and Cannot Suo Motu Decide Maintainability at the Stage of Issuing Summons.
13 Aug 2025The petitioner, engaged in the business of gems and jewellery, filed a suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking summary r...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MSRTC Petition in Guarantor Recovery Dispute — Industrial Court Order Set Aside for Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. Co-guarantor cannot claim protection under MRTU & PULP Act against employer of principal debtor as recovery action is not an unfair labour practice.
13 Jan 2020The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and order dated 05.10.2016 of the Industrial Court, Nagp...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Insufficient Funds Defence Fails as Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Revisional Court Confirms Sentence of One Month Simple Imprisonment and Fine of Rs.1,000 for Dishonour of Cheque Issued for Repayment of Loan.
7 Jul 2011The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Dhondiba Nagoba Ladke, the original accused, challenging his conviction under Section 138 o...
- 71
