Search Results for "Affidavit verification"

1745 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1745 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Liability of Licensee Under Municipal Tender. Condition 15 of Tender Notice Makes Licensee Liable for Municipal Assessment Taxes, Including Property Tax, Despite Ownership Vesting in Corporation.

The petitioner, Raj Dadarkar & Associates, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Supply of Incriminating Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused and Call Data Records Not Furnished.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vilas Vithal Ambokar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 10th April 2015 passed by the Principal Secreta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Employee Transferred from Government Institute to Government Company. Holds That Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Denied on Ground of Transfer Without Option to Retain Government Pension Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Prakash Parshuram Mavlankar, was employed with the erstwhile Haffkine Institute, a government entity under the State of Maharashtra, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Employer's Writ for ABRY Scheme Benefits — Late ECR Filing Not Fatal to Claim. Clause 5 of ABRY Scheme 3.0 Interpreted as Directory, and Baseline Employees Cannot Be Reduced Retrospectively by EPFO.

The petitioner, Lakshmi Electrical Drives Corporate Services LLP, a manpower services provider in Tamil Nadu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.

The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...