Madras High Court Directs Bar Council of India to Consider Approval for Additional Sections in Law Colleges for Academic Year 2025-26. The court held that the Bar Council of India must process applications for additional sections expeditiously and the University must allot students under government quota based on such approval.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 40
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by nine law colleges in Tamil Nadu seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Bar Council of India (BCI) to pass orders on their applications for approval of additional sections for the 3-year LL.B. and 5-year B.A., LL.B. programs for the academic year 2025-26, and to direct the Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University to allot students under government quota for those additional sections. The petitioners had obtained No Objection Certificates from the State Government and affiliation from the University, and had applied to the BCI for approval. However, the BCI had not passed orders on their applications, causing delay in the admission process. The court examined the procedure for establishing Centers for Legal Education and the requirements for approval of additional sections. It noted that the BCI is a statutory body under the Advocates Act, 1961, and is obligated to consider applications in a timely manner. The court directed the BCI to consider the petitioners' applications and pass appropriate orders within four weeks, and further directed the University to allot students under government quota based on the BCI's approval. The court emphasized that the BCI should not delay the process and should ensure that the academic year is not disrupted. The judgment was delivered by a division bench of Justices R. Suresh Kumar and Shamim Ahmed.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Mandamus - Direction to Statutory Body - Bar Council of India Rules - Legal Education - The petitioners, law colleges, sought a writ of mandamus directing the Bar Council of India to pass orders on their applications for approval of additional sections for the academic year 2025-26 and to direct the University to allot students under government quota. The court held that the Bar Council of India must consider the applications and pass appropriate orders within a stipulated time, and the University must act accordingly based on the approval. (Paras 1-20)

B) Legal Education - Approval of Additional Sections - Procedure - Bar Council of India Rules - The court noted that the procedure for establishing a Center for Legal Education requires No Objection Certificate from the State Government, affiliation from the University, and final approval from the Bar Council of India. The same procedure applies for additional sections. The court directed the Bar Council of India to process the applications expeditiously. (Paras 2-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Bar Council of India is obligated to consider and pass orders on applications for approval of additional sections in law colleges for the academic year 2025-26, and whether the University is required to allot students under government quota for such additional sections.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the Bar Council of India to consider the petitioners' applications for approval of additional sections for the academic year 2025-26 and pass appropriate orders within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The court further directed the Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University to allot students under government quota for the additional sections based on the approval granted by the Bar Council of India.

Law Points

  • Mandamus
  • Bar Council of India Rules
  • Legal Education
  • Approval of Additional Sections
  • Affiliation
  • No Objection Certificate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (02) 197

W.P.Nos.48845, 48849, 48870, 48874, 48880, 48893, 48906, 48907 and 48911 of 2025

2026-02-02

R. SURESH KUMAR, SHAMIM AHMED

Mr.M.Ravi, Ms.Dakshayani Reddy (Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Ravi), Mr.A.Selvendran (Special Government Pleader for R1), Mr.S.R.Raghunathan (Standing Counsel for R2), Mr.S.Siva Shanmugam (Standing Counsel for R3)

KMC College of Law, Represented by Correspondent, Aruna Sreedevi G. and others

The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Law Department; The Bar Council of India, Represented by its Secretary; The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Represented by its Registrar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking mandamus to direct the Bar Council of India to pass orders on applications for approval of additional sections in law colleges and to direct the University to allot students under government quota.

Remedy Sought

Writ of mandamus directing the Bar Council of India to pass orders of regular approval for additional sections for the 3-year LL.B. and 5-year B.A., LL.B. programs for the academic year 2025-26, and directing the University to allot students under government quota for those additional sections.

Filing Reason

The Bar Council of India did not pass orders on the petitioners' applications for approval of additional sections, causing delay in the admission process for the academic year 2025-26.

Issues

Whether the Bar Council of India is obligated to consider and pass orders on applications for approval of additional sections in law colleges for the academic year 2025-26. Whether the University is required to allot students under government quota for additional sections upon approval by the Bar Council of India.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that they had complied with all requirements, including obtaining No Objection Certificates from the State Government and affiliation from the University, and had applied to the Bar Council of India for approval of additional sections, but the BCI had not passed orders, causing prejudice to the admission process. The respondents submitted that the BCI would consider the applications in accordance with the rules and pass appropriate orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The Bar Council of India, being a statutory body, is obligated to consider applications for approval of additional sections in law colleges in a timely manner. The University must act upon the approval granted by the BCI for allotment of students under government quota.

Judgment Excerpts

In all these writ petitions, the respective writ petitioners are Centers for Legal Education, commonly known as Law Colleges. The BCI will independently process the application, to be submitted by the Educational Agency for starting the CLE and, on the basis of the input send by the University through affiliation or consent for affiliation, as well as the No Objection Certificate by the State Government and after having conducted an inspection by the team of experts to be sent by the BCI, the approval process would be completed.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed in 2025 and heard by a division bench of the Madras High Court. The court delivered the common order on 02.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Advocates Act, 1961:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Bar Council of India to Consider Approval for Additional Sections in Law Colleges for Academic Year 2025-26. The court held that the Bar Council of India must process applications for additional sections expeditiously and th...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Quash Petitions in Corruption Case Against RTO Officials. Prima Facie Case Exists Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Based on Trap and Recovery of Bribe.