Search Results for "Central Board"

4925 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4925 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Dependents in Railway Accident Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased's attempt to board a moving train held to be an untoward incident, not self-inflicted injury, entitling dependents to compensation.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, dismissing the claim of the dependents of Deepak Nattuji Thakre, who died af...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Preventive Detention Order; Holds That Representation Made After Advisory Board’s Opinion Does Not Violate Section 7 of Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Acts Affecting Public Order Under Section 3 Must Impact the Community at Large, Not Mere Law and Order.

The petitioner, Shyamal Chakraborty, was arrested and detained under Section 3(2) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, by an order of the Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2015

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a direction in an order dated 21.10.2013, passed in Company Application (L) ...