Search Results for "extension agreement"

1872 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1872 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Incorporation of Arbitration Clause by Reference in Sale Orders Under Coal Distribution Scheme. General Reference to Guidelines Containing Arbitration Clause is Sufficient Under Section 7(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present civil appeal arose from an order of the Jharkhand High Court rejecting an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Based on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Unilateral Appointment Does Not Violate Section 12(5) Read with Seventh Schedule When Arbitrator Not Disqualified and Objection Waived by Participation.

The petitioners, Hanuman Motors Pvt. Ltd. and another, challenged an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator appointed by the respondent, M/s. Tata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition Against Guarantors Due to Lack of Privity of Contract. Guarantee Deed Not Signed by Petitioner, No Arbitration Agreement Between Petitioner and Respondents.

The petitioner, L&T Finance Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim relief against the...