Search Results for "section 185"

861 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 861 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Class-IV Employees Terminated Due to Irregular Selection Process. Appointment Based on Interview Without Advertisement Provision Held Invalid; Termination Upheld as Selection Was De Hors the Rules.

The case pertains to a batch of appeals by employees appointed as Class-IV employees in Palamu district, Jharkhand, pursuant to an advertisement dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Quashing of Election Programme for Trade Union. Election Officer Cannot Introduce Reservations Not in Union's Constitution Under Trade Unions Act, 1926.

The case pertains to the election of the Managing Committee of Kopargaon Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Sabha, a representative union registered under the Trade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witnesses for Cross-Examination in Criminal Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Procedural Delays. Accused Granted Opportunity to Cross-Examine P.W. Nos. 3 and 4 Under Section 311 CrPC Despite Previous Recall and Absence of Counsel.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Kishor Pannalal Gurarikar, the accused in Special Criminal Case No. 6 of 2010 pending befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Impleadment of Purchasers in Specific Performance Appeal — Purchasers Claiming Through Plaintiff Are Not Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Protects Their Interests Without Impleadment.

The petitioner, Smt. Sonabai Sahebrao Pathrud, filed a suit for perpetual injunction against respondent no.1, Bhausaheb Ganpati Gaikwad, on 14 Februar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Licensee Status Upheld. Brother-in-law held to be gratuitous licensee, not co-owner, as plaintiff proved self-acquisition of property under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The case involves a dispute between Sujata Ashok Moon (plaintiff/respondent) and Rajendra Parasramji Moon (defendant/appellant) over possession of a t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Testamentary Suit — Execution and Attestation Proved Despite Suspicious Circumstances. Handwriting Expert and Attesting Witness Evidence Accepted to Establish Validity of Will Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The suit was filed by Vibhushit Trivedi, the sole surviving executor, seeking probate of the last Will and testament of Chhotalal Karunashankar Trived...