Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Quashing of Election Programme for Trade Union. Election Officer Cannot Introduce Reservations Not in Union's Constitution Under Trade Unions Act, 1926.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to the election of the Managing Committee of Kopargaon Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Sabha, a representative union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926. The union's Constitution provides for election of delegates to the General Council, which in turn elects the Managing Committee. The Election Officer declared an election programme that introduced unit-wise reservations for the posts of seven Vice-Presidents and seven Secretaries, and reserved eight seats for women in the Executive Committee. These stipulations were not part of the union's Constitution. The Industrial Court quashed the election programme, directing that elections be held as per the Constitution without unit-wise reservations or women's reservation. The High Court upheld this order. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Election Officer cannot introduce reservations or electoral colleges not provided in the Constitution. The Court rejected the argument that what is not prohibited is permitted, noting that the election must be conducted strictly in accordance with the Constitution. The Court observed that while equitable representation may be a laudable objective, it cannot be achieved by violating the constitutional framework. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Trade Union Law - Election - Constitution of Union - The Election Officer cannot introduce unit-wise reservations for posts of Vice-President and Secretary or reservation for women when such stipulations are not part of the union's Constitution. The election must be conducted strictly in accordance with the Constitution of the union. (Paras 11-15)

B) Trade Union Law - Election - Practice vs. Constitution - Mere consistent practice of equitable representation cannot override the express provisions of the union's Constitution. The Election Officer is bound by the Constitution and cannot import ideas not rooted therein. (Paras 5, 15)

C) Trade Union Law - Election - Power of Election Officer - The Election Officer has no power to create separate electoral colleges or reservations not provided in the Constitution. However laudable the objectives, the Election Officer cannot go beyond the confines of the Constitution. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Election Officer could introduce unit-wise reservations for the posts of Vice-Presidents and Secretaries and reservation for women in the election of the Managing Committee of a trade union, when such stipulations were not part of the union's Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's judgment and the Industrial Court's order. The Court held that the election must be conducted strictly in accordance with the Constitution of the Sabha, and the Election Officer cannot introduce unit-wise reservations or women's reservation not provided in the Constitution. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Election to a trade union must be conducted strictly in accordance with its constitution
  • Election officer cannot introduce reservations or electoral colleges not provided in the constitution
  • Practice cannot override constitutional provisions
  • What is not prohibited is not necessarily permitted in statutory bodies
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 lawtext (SC) (7) 124

Civil Appeal No. 5936 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 27698 of 2018)

2019-08-07

Uday Umesh Lalit

Mr. B.H. Marlapalle, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants; Mr. Vinay Navare, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents

Karbhari and others

Deepak V. Chengede and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court judgment dismissing writ petition challenging Industrial Court order quashing election programme of a trade union.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the High Court judgment and uphold the election programme introduced by the Election Officer.

Filing Reason

The Election Officer introduced unit-wise reservations for Vice-Presidents and Secretaries and reservation for women in the Executive Committee, which were not part of the union's Constitution. The Industrial Court quashed the programme, and the High Court upheld that order.

Previous Decisions

Industrial Court, Ahmednagar quashed the election programme on 05.06.2018; High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed Writ Petition No.5599 of 2018 on 12.09.2018.

Issues

Whether the Election Officer could introduce unit-wise reservations for posts of Vice-President and Secretary and reservation for women when not provided in the union's Constitution. Whether the election must be conducted strictly in accordance with the Constitution of the union.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Constitution did not prohibit such reservations and that what is not prohibited is permitted; relied on Laxmidas Dayabhai Kabarwala and National Textile Workers' Union. Respondents argued that the election must be conducted as per the Constitution and the Election Officer cannot go beyond it.

Ratio Decidendi

The election to a trade union must be conducted strictly in accordance with its Constitution. The Election Officer cannot introduce reservations or electoral colleges not provided in the Constitution, however laudable the objectives may be. Practice cannot override constitutional provisions.

Judgment Excerpts

However laudable may be the objectives, the Election Officer could not have gone beyond the confines of the Constitution of the Sabha and could not have imported ideas which were not rooted in the Constitution of the Sabha. The election must be conducted strictly in accordance with the Constitution of the Sabha.

Procedural History

The Election Officer declared election programme on 07.05.2018. Certain members challenged it before Industrial Court, Ahmednagar, which quashed the programme on 05.06.2018. Appellants filed Writ Petition No.5599 of 2018 in the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad, which dismissed it on 12.09.2018. Appellants then filed SLP (Civil) No. 27698 of 2018, which was converted into Civil Appeal No. 5936 of 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Unions Act, 1926:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Quashing of Election Programme for Trade Union. Election Officer Cannot Introduce Reservations Not in Union's Constitution Under Trade Unions Act, 1926.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in IPC Case with Modified Sentence and Partial Abatement. Conviction under Sections 148, 323, 325, 307 read with Section 149 IPC sustained as High Court dismissed appeal but reduced sentence from seven to f...