High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Grant Dispute Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Resolution for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The Court Held That the Deputy Commissioner's Resolution Cancelling Land Grant Without Hearing the Grantees Was Void Ab Initio.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 50
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, Ashok Talwar, Basavaraj Talwar, and Siddappa Hiregannavar, filed a writ appeal against an order dated 20.09.2021 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court in W.P.No.71343/2012. The writ petition was filed by respondent Nos.4, 5, and 6 (Neelavva, Shankravva, and Paravva) challenging a resolution dated 03.08.2010 passed by respondent No.1, the Deputy Commissioner and Chairman of Bhoo Odetan Yojaneya Anusthan Samiti (BOYAS), Dharwad. The resolution cancelled a land grant that had been made in favour of the appellants. The Single Judge quashed the resolution on the ground that it was passed without affording the appellants an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The appellants appealed against this order. The Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, heard the appeal. The Court noted that the resolution was passed without any notice to the appellants and without giving them a chance to be heard. The Court held that the order was void ab initio and that the Single Judge had correctly quashed it. The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Single Judge was upheld. The Court did not find any merit in the appeal and declined to interfere.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Natural Justice - Cancellation of Land Grant - Audi Alteram Partem - Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - The Deputy Commissioner passed a resolution cancelling the land grant made to the appellants without issuing any notice or affording them an opportunity of hearing. The Court held that such an order passed in violation of principles of natural justice is void ab initio and cannot be sustained. (Paras 1-3)

B) Land Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Scope of Interference - Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - The learned Single Judge quashed the resolution dated 03.08.2010 on the ground that it was passed without hearing the grantees. The Division Bench affirmed this view, holding that no interference is warranted in the writ appeal. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the resolution dated 03.08.2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner cancelling the land grant in favour of the appellants without affording them an opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The order dated 20.09.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.71343/2012 is upheld.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Karnataka Land Revenue Act
  • 1964
  • Karnataka Land Grant Rules
  • 1969
  • Writ Jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (08) 43

WA No. 100268 of 2021 (KLR-RR/SUR)

2025-08-04

Vibhu Bakhru, C.J., C.M. Poonacha, J.

Sri. Mrutyunjay Tata Bangi (for appellants), Sri. Praveen K. Uppar (AGA for R1 & R2), Sri. Dattatray T. Hebbar & Sri. Vijaykumar Horatti (for C/R4-R6)

Ashok S/o. Ningappa Talwar, Basavaraj S/o. Ningappa Talwar, Siddappa S/o. Adiveppa Hiregannavar

The Deputy Commissioner and Chairman, Bhoo Odetan Yojaneya Anuthan Samiti, Dharwad; The Tahasildar, Hubli; District Manager, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Development Corporation, Dharwad; Neelavva W/o. Yallappa Hiregannavar; Shankravva W/o. Ramappa Hiragannaver; Paravva D/o. Ramappa Hiragannaver

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against order of Single Judge quashing resolution cancelling land grant.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the order dated 20.09.2021 passed by the Single Judge in W.P.No.71343/2012.

Filing Reason

The resolution dated 03.08.2010 cancelling the land grant was passed without hearing the appellants.

Previous Decisions

The Single Judge quashed the resolution dated 03.08.2010 in W.P.No.71343/2012.

Issues

Whether the resolution dated 03.08.2010 cancelling the land grant without affording an opportunity of hearing is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the resolution was valid and the Single Judge erred in quashing it. Respondents supported the Single Judge's order, contending that the resolution was passed in violation of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

An order cancelling a land grant without affording the grantee an opportunity of hearing is void ab initio as it violates principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The said resolution was passed without any notice to the appellants and without affording them an opportunity of hearing. The learned Single Judge had quashed the resolution on the ground that the same was passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the appellants.

Procedural History

Respondent Nos.4-6 filed W.P.No.71343/2012 challenging resolution dated 03.08.2010. Single Judge quashed the resolution on 20.09.2021. Appellants filed WA No.100268/2021 against that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claims for Exported Cables in Central Excise Case — Emphasizes Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Technicalities. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits, Not Merely Endorse Lower Authorities' Findings Under Ru...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Charity Commissioner's Permission for Sale of Trust Property Due to Inadequate Price and Non-Compliance with Section 36(1)(a) of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. Court holds that the price offered was not the market price and ...