Search Results for "possession delay"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "possession delay"

3781 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3781 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Heirs' Challenge to Gold Seizure and Penalty Under Gold (Control) Act, 1968 — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Possession of Primary Gold Without Permit. Burden of Proof on Possessor Not Discharged; Penalty of Rs. 5,000 Upheld as Within Statutory Limits.

20 Apr 2006

The petitioners, heirs of late Ramratan Shrivallabh Chandak, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28th February 1986 passed by the Customs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition for Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Dispute Over Possession of Flats for Redevelopment Not Arbitrable as Members Not Bound by Development Agreement. The court held that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cannot be granted against persons who are not parties to the arbitration agreement, and the members of the society were not bound by the arbitration clause in the development agreement.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Shri Krishan Sai Development Corporation, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Trustees to Prosecute Eviction Suit Despite Court Receiver's Appointment — Leave Held Not Required for Period When Receiver Was Not in Possession. The Court held that since the Court Receiver was never in actual possession of the suit flat, the Applicants did not require leave to continue the RAE Suit under Section 80 CPC.

16 Jun 2015

The Applicants, as Trustees under an Indenture of Trust dated 6th October 1937, are the owners and landlords of a building known as 'Dhun Abad' at 106...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Possession of Auctioned Property — Bank Not Obligated to Deliver Vacant Possession Under SARFAESI Act. SARFAESI Act, 2002 Section 13(4) and Section 17 — Auction Sale Confirmed in Favor of Petitioner, but Bank Delivered Only Symbolic Possession; Petitioner's Remedy Lies Before DRT Under Section 17.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Mr. Suresh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Decree-Holder's Execution Against Pendente Lite Purchaser in Possession Suit. Held that a purchaser pendente lite is bound by the decree and can be dispossessed in execution under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC without a separate suit.

20 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Kashinath Ramji Shinde (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a suit in 1987 seeking possession, declaration, and mesne p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Court Upholds Award Holding That Partnership Was Dissolved by Consent and That Claims Were Barred by Limitation. The court affirmed the arbitrator's findings that the partnership was dissolved by mutual consent and that the claims were barred by limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963.

15 Jan 2018

The petitioners, nine individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award dated 30/09/2016...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Writ Petition Against Obstruction by Third Party in Execution Proceedings — Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Objection by brother of judgment-debtor claiming independent possession held to be abuse of process where decree of eviction under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act had been confirmed by Supreme Court.

31 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Kailashchandra Agrawal, obtained a decree of eviction against respondent No.1 (Kochaveedu Varghese Joseph) in Special Civil Suit No.51...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in SC/ST Act Case Finding Abuse of Process by Complainant. Dispute Pertaining to Property Ownership and Possession Found to be Purely Civil in Nature, Not Criminal, Under Sections 465, 468, 471, 420, 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(f)(p)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act.

28 Jul 2023

The petitioners, accused Nos. 2 and 3, sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. arising from Crime No.219/2018 for offences u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Orders of In-charge Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Under SARFAESI Act in Challenge to Jurisdiction. Court Examines Whether In-charge Officer Could Validly Pass Orders Under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Citing De-Facto Doctrine.

28 Oct 2015

The writ petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged orders passed by the In-charge Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer and Purchaser's Appeals in Execution of Consumer Court Decree for Possession — Decree Not Conditional; Failure to Intimate Charges Prevents Default. Developer's Obligation to Inform Decree-Holder About MSEB Charges Within Fifteen Days Was Condition Precedent, and Non-Performance Meant Decree-Holder's Obligation to Pay Never Arose Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 47.

7 Feb 2020

This case involved the execution of a Consumer Court decree for possession of an immovable property. The decree-holder, a lady government servant, had...

83 84 85 86 87

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)