Search Results for "money order refused"

2840 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2840 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Stay of Cancellation of Letter of Award in Tender Dispute. Court holds that disputes arising from pre-contractual stage are not arbitrable and interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when no arbitration agreement exists.

The Petitioner, Provident Multi-Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement and Pension Cut of Municipal Employee in Corruption Case Despite Acquittal. Departmental Enquiry Entrusted by Urban Development Department Held Competent and Acquittal in Criminal Case Found Not to Vitiate Penalty under Karnataka Lokayukta Act.

The petitioner, a municipal employee who served as in-charge Chief Officer of Town Municipal Council, challenged the compulsory retirement and permane...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Exparte Divorce Decree Due to Non-Compliance with Summons Service Rules. Family Court Failed to Require Affidavit of Bailiff or Examine Him as Mandated by Rule 19 of Family Court Rules, 1988 and Order V Rules 17, 19 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

This is an appeal filed by the husband against an exparte decree of dissolution of marriage granted by the Family Court, Aurangabad on the grounds of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree for Execution of Sale Deed. Agreement of Sale Dated 02.08.2007 Proved by Plaintiff; Defendants Failed to Discharge Burden of Proof Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants (defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 20.10.2012 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Channarayapatna, in O.S. No. 4/2008,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...