Search Results for "Article 173"

1059 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1059 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Causing Hurt Under Sections 302 and 324 IPC. Conviction Under IPC Sections 302 and 324 with Section 149 Based on Evidence of Unlawful Assembly and Assault Leading to Death and Injury.

The appeal arose from the conviction of six accused/appellants by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 277 of 2012 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirmation Case and Criminal Appeal in Death Sentence Matter — Dying Declarations and Circumstantial Evidence Discussed.

The matter involved confirmation of death sentence under Section 368 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and a criminal appeal against conviction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Irregular Deposit of Rent Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Does Not Bar Eviction. Tenant's failure to deposit rent regularly despite court order justified decree for possession.

The case involves a dispute between the landlord (respondent) and the tenant (applicant) over eviction from a flat in Mumbai. The landlord filed a sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Weak Evidence. Bail was allowed as appellants were in custody for over four years without charges framed, and evidence under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and UAPA provisions was insufficient to deny bail.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by two accused persons, identified as accused nos. 46 and 47, who were charged with offences under the Unlawful...