Search Results for "valuation date"

1752 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1752 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.902 OF 2014

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Findings of Fact Are Final and Not Re-Examinable Under Section 34.

The petitioners, Dr. Dhiren Lalit Shah and others, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Specific Performance Suit. Court holds that the plaint discloses a cause of action and the suit is not barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendant No.4 (appellant) challenging an order dated 06.05.2023 passed by the 2nd Additio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery in Auto Rickshaw Snatching Case — Identification by Informant and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 394 IPC.

The revision petitioner, Mansingh Dhonduram Sakpal, was convicted by the trial Magistrate for the offence punishable under Section 394 read with Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal in Specific Performance Suit — Directs Trial Court to Frame Limitation as Preliminary Issue. Agreement of Sale Dated 1974, Suit Filed in 2016, Court Finds Prima Facie Bar of Limitation but Allows Issue to Be Decided After Trial.

The petitioners, original defendants, filed a civil revision challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jalgaon-Jamod, dated 8.7.2016,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Evidence for Enhanced Market Value. Claimants Failed to Prove Market Value Through Comparable Sales or Reliable Expert Evidence, Resulting in Restoration of Original Compensation.

The appeal was filed by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging the enhancemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs.25,000 per Hectare Based on Comparable Sale Instance. Claimant Failed to Prove Higher Market Value Despite Claim of Rs.50,000 per Hectare Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Anand Tukaram Banmare, was the owner of agricultural land bearing Survey No.362 admeasuring 2.12 H.R. at Mouza Jamb, Tahsil Samudrapur,...