Search Results for "take notice"

17088 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17088 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Applicant in Abetment of Suicide Case. Show-Cause Notice Issued in Official Capacity Not Abetment Under Section 306 IPC.

The present matter arose from a criminal application filed before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, seeking quashing of First Information Report No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Notification and Collector's Order Under Maharashtra Private Forest Act. Land Declared as Forest in 1960 Notification Cannot Be Challenged After Decades; Collector's Suo Motu Order Under Section 22(5) Upheld.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of land in Survey No.245/4B, Kavesar, Thane, challenged an order dated 27 March 2015 passed suo motu by the Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act for Delayed Payment. Court Analyses Effect of Interim Stay on Demand Date Under Section 31(4).

The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging demand n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act for A.Y. 2012-13 Based on Search Action — Held That Section 153C Overrides Section 147 for Search-Related Assessments

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of writ petitions challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit in Income Tax Reassessment — Notice Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Invalid.

The petitioner, AMNS Khopoli Limited (formerly Uttam Galva Steels Limited), challenged a notice dated 31st May 2023 issued by the Assistant Commission...