Bombay High Court Quashes Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit in Income Tax Reassessment — Notice Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Invalid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, AMNS Khopoli Limited (formerly Uttam Galva Steels Limited), challenged a notice dated 31st May 2023 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax) under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2016-17. The petitioner contended that the notice was barred by limitation under Section 149 of the Act, which prescribes a time limit for issuance of such notices. The court examined the relevant provisions and found that the notice was issued beyond the permissible period. The court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue the notice and quashed it. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Limitation - Section 143(2) Notice - Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - The notice under Section 143(2) was issued on 31st May 2023 for the assessment year 2016-17, which is beyond the period of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year as prescribed under Section 149. The court held that the notice is barred by limitation and quashed it. (Paras 1-10)

B) Income Tax - Reassessment - Validity of Notice - Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - The court examined the timeline and found that the notice was issued after the expiry of the statutory period. The court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue the notice. (Paras 5-10)

C) Corporate Law - Change of Name - CIRP - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The petitioner was formerly known as Uttam Galva Steels Limited and underwent a change of name after acquisition under CIRP. The court noted the change but did not base its decision on this fact. (Para 3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notice dated 31st May 2023 issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is barred by limitation and therefore invalid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the notice dated 31st May 2023 issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petition was allowed. Rule made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Limitation period for issuance of notice under Section 143(2) of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Section 149 of Income Tax Act
  • Reassessment notice beyond time limit
  • Invalid notice
  • CIRP and change of name
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (04) 84

Writ Petition (L) No. 6313 of 2024

2024-04-23

K. R. Shriram, Dr. Neela Gokhale

2024:BHC-OS:6965-DB

Mr. Venkatesh Dhond, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Niraj Seth, Ms. Shreya Gupta, Mr. Abhijeet Sadikale, Ms. Swagata Ghosh, Ms. Prachi Gupta and Ms. Karishma Rao i/b Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. for Petitioner. Ms. Swapna Gokhale for Respondents-Revenue.

AMNS Khopoli Limited (Formerly known as Uttam Galva Steels Limited)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax), Circle 1(1)(1), Delhi; Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 5(4), Mumbai; Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the validity of a notice issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground of limitation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the notice dated 31st May 2023 issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Filing Reason

The notice was issued beyond the statutory period of limitation under Section 149 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issues

Whether the notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 31st May 2023 is barred by limitation.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the notice was issued beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 149 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Revenue's arguments are not mentioned in the text.

Ratio Decidendi

A notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued beyond the period of limitation prescribed under Section 149 of the Act is invalid and without jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

Since the pleadings in the petition are completed, we have decided to dispose the petition at the admission stage itself. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Procedural History

The petition was filed challenging the notice dated 31st May 2023. The court heard the matter and disposed it at the admission stage.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 143(2), 149
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit in Income Tax Reassessment — Notice Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Invalid.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Over Recovery of Possession. The substantial question of law regarding Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 was answere...