Search Results for "subsequent act"

13074 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13074 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Designation of Senior Advocates Without Framed Rules Under Advocates Act, 1961. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Require High Court to Frame Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates.

These writ petitions were filed in public interest by two advocates practicing in the High Court of Karnataka, challenging notifications dated 30.06.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Exclusion from Voters List for Co-operative Society Elections. Petitioner Contends That Delegation Form Submitted Before Administrator Appointment Must Be Given Effect, While Respondents Assert Board's Term Had Expired.

The petitioner, a director of the Kasaba Primary Agriculture Credit Co-operative Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in MSMED Act Arbitration Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner's alternative remedy by way of appeal was availed and withdrawn, and no grounds for review exist.

The petitioner, Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a supplier under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 1793 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company Application Seeking Recall of Winding Up Petition Admission Order Against Kingfisher Airlines Limited. Company Court Has No Power to Recall or Review Its Own Order Admitting a Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956.

The applicant, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, filed an application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking recall of the order dated 30.10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2025

The appellant, a partnership firm, filed a commercial suit for recovery of its claim amount after attempting pre-institution mediation. The appellant ...