Search Results for "land water dispute"

1601 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1601 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction of Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Appellant, a surveyor, challenged conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Act, contending that sanction order was invalid and amount received was legal fees.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the judgment of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Special Case No.67/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Alleged Encroachment under Section 14(1)(j3) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958

The petitioner, Sau. Sandhya Hemant Salunke, was elected as a member of Walwadi Gram Panchayat in 2010 and subsequently as Sarpanch. Respondents 5 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and last seen theory beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Venkati s/o Balaji Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the murder of his half-brother Tukaram under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the conviction of three appellants, Sadashiv Babu Patil, Sambhaji Sadashiv Patil, and Shivaji Sadashiv Patil, under Section 302 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Acquisition Notice Against Cooperative Housing Society for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Act. Failure to Consider Petitioner's Compliance and Lack of Proper Inquiry Renders Acquisition Invalid.

The petitioner, The Reserve Bank Employees' Snehdhara Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...