Search Results for "advance purchase"

1277 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1277 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute Over Liquidated Damages. Arbitrator's finding that liquidated damages were not recoverable due to absence of proof of loss upheld under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Union of India, acting through the Controller of Stores, Western Railway, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Despite Defective Arbitration Clause in Work Orders. Court Holds That Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, It Can Appoint Sole Arbitrator When Arbitration Agreement Is Invalid Due to Lack of Mechanism for Third Arbitrator.

The Applicant, Voltas Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Larger Bench Holds Shareholder/Promoter is an 'Aggrieved Person' Under Section 61 IBC and Has Locus to Challenge Section 7 Admission Order. The reference resolves conflicting views on maintainability of appeal by shareholder against admission of insolvency petition.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai Bench, in a larger bench of three members, addressed a reference question: whether a share...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine and Enforceable Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Discrepancies in Pleadings.

The appellant, Harish, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 05.12.2008 allegedly executed by the respondents in his fav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Re-Assessment Orders in KVAT Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Input Tax Credit Denial Based on Non-Availability of Selling Dealers at Registered Address Held Invalid Under Section 10(2) and Section 39 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s Onyx Designs, a proprietorship concern dealing in bags and gift items, was a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax...