CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005
12 Apr 2013The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...
Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"
1261 result(s) found
Found 1261 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Director for Company Tax Dues — Holds Revenue Failed to Prove Lack of Diligence or Recovery from Company. Petitioner not liable as director under Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for taxes of Kaizen Automation Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10 because Revenue did not establish that tax could not be recovered from the company despite reasonable efforts.
12 Jun 2023The petitioner, Prakash B. Kamat, a mechanical engineer, developed a smart card-based ticketing solution and incorporated Kaizen Automation Pvt. Ltd. ...
- 21
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Penalty on Part-Time Director in FERA Contravention Case Due to Lack of Specific Findings on Responsibility. Liability Under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Requires Proof That Director Was in Charge of and Responsible for Conduct of Business at Relevant Time, Not Mere Directorship.
27 Jul 2020The appeal arose from a penalty imposed on the appellant, a part-time non-executive director of Modi Xerox Ltd., for alleged contravention of the Fore...
- 255
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Execution Application Filed by Claimant Against Respondent in Arbitration Matter — Decision by IMPPA Committee Not an Arbitral Award Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
7 Apr 2014The case involves a chamber summons filed by the respondent, Sanjay Dutt, seeking dismissal of an execution application filed by the claimant, Shakeel...
- 377
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions in PMLA Case, Upholding High Court's Order with Costs. High Court's dismissal of writ petitions seeking quashing of ECIR and prosecution complaint under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, was justified as petitions lacked merit and were not maintainable.
21 Apr 2023The dispute arose from petitions filed by Anoop Bartaria, Director of World Trade Park Ltd., and the company itself, challenging a common judgment and...
- 358
High Court
Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Cairn India Limited with Foreign Subsidiaries Under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court approved the transfer of Indian undertakings from four foreign subsidiaries to the Indian listed company to simplify corporate structure.
22 Jun 2010The petitioner, Cairn India Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and listed on Indian stock exchanges, filed a petition under...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Exemption for Warehousing of Tea as Agricultural Produce under GST. Tea stored in 50 kg bags after standard processing is 'agricultural produce' eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
11 Dec 2023The petitioner, Nutan Warehousing Company Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of warehousing, ...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Order Declaring Transfer of Employees as Illegal Change Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Transfer from Polyester Department to Spurn Yarn Department Without Notice of Change Violates Section 42 Read with Schedule II Items 1,2,4,5 of BIR Act.
5 Oct 2016The petitioner, Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 5 December 2006 passed by the Labour Cour...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Petitioner's Rights Restored. The Court held that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering with a reasoned order of the Assistant Commissioner without proper application of mind.
5 Apr 2023The petitioner, Sri Vijayachandra, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an order dated 11.11.2014 passed by the first ...
- 76
High Court
High Court Allows Appeal of Regional Rural Bank in Income Tax Dispute — Expenditure on Raising Capital Held Allowable Under Section 36(1)(viii) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure incurred for raising capital by a regional rural bank is not capital expenditure but revenue expenditure allowable under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
28 May 2018The appellant, M/s Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank, a regional rural bank, filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order...
- 45
