High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Petitioner's Rights Restored. The Court held that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering with a reasoned order of the Assistant Commissioner without proper application of mind.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 60
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri Vijayachandra, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an order dated 11.11.2014 passed by the first respondent (State of Karnataka, Department of Co-operative) in Revision Petition No.CO/18/CAP/2013. The revision petition had been filed against an order of the Assistant Commissioner (second respondent) concerning the Primary Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank, Udupi. The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the revisional order and an interim stay. The High Court, after hearing the matter, found that the revisional authority had exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside the Assistant Commissioner's order without providing any reasons and without proper application of mind. The court emphasized that revisional powers must be exercised judiciously and that quasi-judicial orders must be speaking orders. Consequently, the High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned revisional order, and restored the order of the Assistant Commissioner.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Revisional Jurisdiction - Scope of Interference - Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, Section 30 - The revisional authority must exercise its power judiciously and cannot substitute its own opinion without finding any illegality or irregularity in the order under revision. The impugned order dated 11.11.2014 was set aside as it was passed without proper application of mind and without giving reasons. (Paras 1-3)

B) Co-operative Law - Natural Justice - Speaking Orders - Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - An order passed by a quasi-judicial authority must be a speaking order containing reasons. The revisional order failed to meet this requirement and was therefore quashed. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the revisional authority under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, can set aside a well-reasoned order of the Assistant Commissioner without providing adequate reasons and without affording proper opportunity of hearing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 11.11.2014 passed by the first respondent in Revision Petition No.CO/18/CAP/2013 is quashed. The order of the Assistant Commissioner is restored.

Law Points

  • Revisional jurisdiction under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1959
  • Scope of interference
  • Natural justice
  • Speaking orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (04) 20

Writ Petition No. 57108 of 2014 (CS-DAS)

2023-04-05

Suraj Govindaraj

Sri. K A Ariga

Sri Vijayachandra

State of Karnataka, The Assistant Commissioner, The Primary Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank, Sri Suresh Naik, Sri Kalu Naik, Sri Babanna Naik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a revisional order under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 11.11.2014 passed by the first respondent in Revision Petition No.CO/18/CAP/2013.

Filing Reason

The petitioner contended that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction and passed an order without reasons.

Previous Decisions

The Assistant Commissioner had passed an order which was challenged in revision before the first respondent, who set it aside.

Issues

Whether the revisional authority acted within its jurisdiction under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. Whether the impugned order was a speaking order and passed in compliance with principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the revisional order was arbitrary and without application of mind. The respondents did not appear or were not represented.

Ratio Decidendi

A revisional authority under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, must exercise its power judiciously and pass a speaking order. An order without reasons and without proper application of mind is liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a Writ or direction in nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 11.11.2014 in Revision Petition No.CO/18/CAP/2013 (Annexure-A) passed by the 1st Respondent. This petition, coming on for final hearing, this day, the court made the following: ORDER

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the revisional order dated 11.11.2014. The petition was heard and disposed of on 05.04.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959: Section 30
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Petitioner's Rights Restored. The Court held that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering with a reasoned order of the Assistant Commissioner wi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Seniority Dispute – Kerala Water Authority – Special Rules 1960 – Subordinate Service Rules 1966 – Promotion Quotas – Degree vs. Diploma Quota – Applicability of Rule 4(b) – Supreme Court Overturns High Court Ruling. Promotion and Seni...