Search Results for "section 397"

1303 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1303 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Mandatory Before Cognizance Can Be Taken by Special Judge.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Framing of Charges in Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage and Coercion. Consent Obtained Under Misconception of Fact or Fear of Defamation is Vitiated and Constitutes Rape Under Section 375 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissing the appellant's revision agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Further Investigation Order in Murder Case Due to Delay and Abuse of Process — High Court's Direction for Further Investigation Set Aside as It Was Sought After Trial Concluded and Earlier Section 311 Petition Was Dismissed.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the accused, K. Vadivel, challenging the judgment of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dated 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 11 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rule 14 of PFA Rules Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sri. Syed Ahammed, was the accused in Criminal Case No.1022/2008 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sakaleshpura, for an offence under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Police Action and Reference for Contempt in Lalita Kumari Compliance Case. Court holds that petitioner failed to demonstrate any violation of directions in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. and that the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order was not perverse.

The petitioner, Vishwas Sudhanshu Bhamburkar, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with S...