Search Results for "Share"

5794 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5794 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Due to Limitation Bar. Delay of 85 Days in Filing Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act Not Condoned for Lack of Sufficient Cause.

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Partition and Adverse Possession. The court held that the appellant failed to prove exclusive title and that the suit was barred by limitation and res judicata.

The case involves a property dispute over Gut No. 152, Old Survey No. 76, admeasuring 5H 36R (13 acres) at Village Pimpri, Taluka Khurd, District Aura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Order in Final Decree Proceedings for Lack of Jurisdiction — Order on I.A.Nos.15, 16 and 17 in FDP No.2/2008 Quashed for Exceeding Scope of Preliminary Decree and Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The present writ petition was filed by the petitioners (defendants in the original suit) challenging the order dated 10.06.2022 passed by the learned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Sets Aside Condition of Payment for Renovation Expenses. The Court held that the trial Court's direction to pay Rs.1,33,000/- for improvement expenses without proper enquiry was unsustainable and should be determined in final decree proceedings.

The appellant, plaintiff in O.S.No.33/2015, filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction claiming one-third share in the suit property inherite...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Will and Possession. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse.

The appellant, original defendant Jayawant (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil ...