Search Results for "public law element"

2014 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2014 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985

The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State and Municipal Corporation to Remove Unauthorized Religious Structures in Public Interest Litigation. Illegal Shrines Built After Supreme Court Cutoff Date Must Be Demolished Without Delay, and Older Structures Must Be Categorized for Regularization, Relocation, or Removal.

The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Society for Fast Justice and another petitioner highlighting the failure of the State of Maharashtra and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Temporary Civil Judge's Services Under M.P. Temporary Service Rules, 1960. Order Found Non-Punitive and Article 311 Not Attracted as It Did Not Cast Any Stigma.

The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by a temporary Civil Judge in the State of Madhya Pradesh challenging the termination of his services. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application by Vidarbha Cricket Association in Pension Dispute. Writ Petition Maintainable Against Society Performing Public Functions Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The judgment concerns a Miscellaneous Civil Application filed by Vidarbha Cricket Association (VCA) seeking recall/review of an order dated 09.08.2012...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against 24 Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, 24 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan Due to Unenforceable Oral Agreement and Lack of Written Contract. Loan advanced for litigation funding held to be a contingent agreement not enforceable under Order 37 CPC as it lacked a written contract and was based on an oral understanding.

The plaintiff, Vishal Kedia, filed a commercial summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Sureshkumar S...