Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

2149 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2149 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute — Finds No Error in Revenue Authority's Order Based on Prior Civil Court Decree. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Petition Barred by Delay and Laches.

28 Apr 2014

The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Shankar Bandgar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Latur, dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Industrial Training Institute Challenging Tribunal's Jurisdiction Under MEPS Act. Held that an Industrial Training Institute is not a 'Private School' under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, and therefore an employee cannot file an appeal under Section 9 of the Act.

16 Oct 2006

The petitioners, St. Francis Industrial Training Institute and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Issue Certificate of Purchase Under Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court held that the tenant's right to purchase land under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is not barred by limitation despite delay in issuance of certificate, and the Mamlatdar's order was perverse.

4 May 2011

The petitioner, Mesaji S/o Laxman Ubare, was a tenant of agricultural land owned by the respondents. He claimed to have become a deemed purchaser of t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Insurer's Petition Challenging Warrant of Attachment for TDS Deduction on Interest Component of Motor Accident Compensation Award. The court held that the insurer's deduction of TDS under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, though erroneous because the claimant was an individual entitled to exemption under Section 194A(3)(ix), did not justify attachment as the TDS amount was already deposited with the Income Tax Authority and the claimant could seek refund.

15 Nov 2016

The New India Assurance Company Limited (Petitioner) challenged an order dated 21 November 2014 passed by the Maharashtra Accident Claims Tribunal, Mu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Dispute — Award Under 1940 Act Cannot Be Enforced Under 1996 Act. Contractor's Award for Road Construction Work Held Unenforceable as Arbitration Was Governed by Arbitration Act, 1940 and Award Was Not Made Rule of Court.

1 Feb 2019

The appellant, M/s. Radhey Shyam Associates, a contractor, filed a Letters Patent Appeal challenging the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Mutation entries are summary in nature and do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved by a civil court.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries made in the revenue reco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Split Bench Delivers Dissenting Opinion on Bar Council Election Rules Validity; Dissenting Judge Holds Rules 6(h) and 32(g) Intra Vires Advocates Act. The dissenting opinion concluded that the impugned election rules did not violate Sections 3(2)(b), 3(4) and 49(1)(a) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

13 Dec 2006

This matter concerned two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of certain rules of the Bar Council of Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Factory in Lump-Sum Contribution Dispute. Agreement for lump-sum contribution in lieu of taxes under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Rules, 1961 held binding on village panchayat, barring unilateral revision of tax.

26 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Ltd., a public limited company located within the territorial jurisdiction of Village Panchayat Jogeshwari, challenged a ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

12 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Lower Appellate Court Failed to Re-appreciate Evidence. The Court held that the first appellate court's non-application of mind to evidence constituted a substantial question of law under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, warranting remand for fresh consideration.

12 Nov 2025

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant, Krishnabai Babya Navale, challenging the judgment dated 21.01.2017 passed by the le...

79 80 81 82 83

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)