Search Results for "statutory notice requirements"

3645 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3645 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Arbitration Petition No. 1070 of 2011 Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Seeks Reference to ICC Arbitration in Dubai Pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement; the Judgment Text is Incomplete.

The matter arose from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 10 December 2004 between Welspun Trading Limited (transferor) and Eupec PipeCoatings GmbH...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Petitioners Against Union of India and NHAI -- Challenge to Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act, 1956 Fails -- Section 94 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable

The petitioners, owners of galas in Godown L1, challenged NHAI's acquisition of part of the godown for the Vadodara Mumbai Expressway under the Nation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute. Court Allows Appointment of Receiver to Secure Hypothecated Assets Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed three applications before the Madras High Court: Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Stay of Cancellation of Letter of Award in Tender Dispute. Court holds that disputes arising from pre-contractual stage are not arbitrable and interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when no arbitration agreement exists.

The Petitioner, Provident Multi-Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Section 35(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Notice Issued by Tahsildar Without Proper Verification of Signatures and Without Giving Opportunity to Sarpanch to Explain Grounds.

The petitioner, Shri Raviraj Sambhajirao Nimbalkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kalnakwadi, Kolhapur. On 21st November 2017, some members...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...