Search Results for "revenue officer"

6134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Co-owner's Title in Ancestral Property Despite Consolidation Officer's Order Expunging Name. Section 49 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 Does Not Confer Power to Divest Pre-existing Tenure Holder's Ownership Rights.

The case concerns a dispute over ancestral land in village Mustafabad, Haridwar, originally owned by Angat, who had three sons: Ramji Lal, Khushi Ram,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Seizure and Fine in Minor Mineral Transport Case — Tractor Carrying Murum for Filling Potholes Not Illegal Mining. Use of Tractor for Personal Purpose Without Royalty Receipt Does Not Attract Penalty Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Prakash Tumdu Chaudhari and Sujit Prakash Gujrati, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition by BBMP Employees Challenging Promotion of Juniors Based on PUC Qualification. Senior Group D Employees Claim Discrimination as 2014 Clarification Exempted SSLC Holders from PUC Requirement for Promotion to Tax Inspector Posts.

The writ petition was filed by seventeen employees of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) working as Group D employees, challenging a promotion ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal Against Bangalore ITAT Order Lies Only Before Karnataka High Court Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune (the Revenue) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016, declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 for Unexplained Share Capital. Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investor Companies Despite Receiving Share Premium at Rs. 190 per Share.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...