Search Results for "exhaustive provisions"

1788 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1788 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers BDA's Appeal Against Quashing of Land Acquisition Notifications Under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976. Case Involves Dispute Over Inclusion of 5 Acres Not in Preliminary Notification and Offer of 40% Developed Land as Compensation.

The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) initiated acquisition proceedings for 4,043 acres 27 guntas of land to form the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Protection of Sacred Groves/Orans in Rajasthan as Deemed Forests Under Forest Conservation Act, 1980. Recognizes Ecological and Cultural Significance of Community-Conserved Forests and Balances Community Rights with Conservation Goals.

The Supreme Court of India was hearing an interlocutory application in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India writ petition, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Interim Order Restraining Adjudication Proceedings. Civil Suit Against SEBI Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) against an interim order passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. District Court's Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Upheld as Petitioner's Non-Participation Caused Delay.

The Petitioner, M/s. Magnum Opus IT consulting Private Limited, a company engaged in e-governance, challenged an order dated 03/02/2021 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenant's Claim Not Established. The court held that the appellant failed to prove tenancy and that the remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act is available to any person aggrieved, including tenants.

The appellant, Modinasab Indikar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the order of the District Magistrate, Salcete, d...