Supreme Court Allows Interim Relief for Political Group in Symbol Dispute Pending Final Adjudication. The Court directed the Election Commission to permit the applicant group to use a common symbol and name for upcoming elections, without prejudice to the main dispute over the AIADMK party name and 'Two Leaves' symbol.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court was hearing a miscellaneous application filed by T.T.V. Dhinakaran (TTVD), respondent No.1 in a disposed of special leave petition, seeking interim directions for allotment of an election symbol and party name for upcoming elections. The background involves a dispute between two factions of the AIADMK political party in Tamil Nadu. The Election Commission of India (ECI) had, by its decision dated 23 November 2017, accepted the claim of the group led by E. Madhusudhanan (EM) and Edapaddi K. Palaniswami (EKP) to use the party name 'AIADMK' and its reserved symbol 'Two Leaves', rejecting the claim of the group led by V.K. Sasikala (VKS) and TTVD. TTVD challenged this decision before the Delhi High Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.10728 of 2017, which is still pending. During the pendency of the writ petition, when local body elections were announced, TTVD moved an interim application (C.M. No.2994/2018) seeking permission to use a common symbol and name. The Single Judge of the High Court allowed the application on 9 March 2018, directing ECI to permit TTVD's group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and a name of their choice. EKP, representing the other faction, filed SLP(C) No.7258 of 2018 against this interim order. On 28 March 2018, the Supreme Court disposed of the SLP without examining merits, keeping the Single Judge's interim order in abeyance, directing the High Court to expedite the main writ petition, and granting liberty to parties to approach the Court if any new election notification was issued. Subsequently, on 31 December 2018, ECI notified a by-election for the Thiruvarur Assembly constituency, prompting TTVD to file the present miscellaneous application on 2 January 2019, seeking similar interim relief. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the application was not maintainable as the SLP was disposed of and the Court had become functus officio. The Supreme Court rejected this objection, holding that the liberty granted in the order of 28 March 2018 expressly allowed parties to approach the Court in the event of a new election notification, and dismissing the application would trivialize that liberty. The Court noted that the writ petition was still pending before the High Court and that the Single Judge's interim order had not been independently challenged by the ECI. The Court directed ECI to pass an appropriate order permitting TTVD and his group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and a name of their choice for the upcoming by-election, as an interim measure, without prejudice to the rights of parties in the main writ petition. The Court clarified that this direction was not an expression on the merits of the dispute and that the High Court should decide the main writ petition expeditiously.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Maintainability of Application in Disposed of SLP - Liberty Granted by Court - The Supreme Court held that where liberty is expressly reserved in the order disposing of the SLP, the Court retains jurisdiction to entertain a subsequent application for interim relief, even though the SLP is disposed of, to prevent trivializing the spirit of the liberty granted. (Paras 8-10)

B) Election Law - Interim Arrangement for Symbol and Name - Pending Final Adjudication - The Court directed the Election Commission to pass an appropriate order permitting the applicant and his group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and name of their choice for upcoming elections, as an interim measure, without prejudice to the rights of parties in the main writ petition. (Paras 11-12)

C) Election Law - Symbol Dispute - Group Claim - The dispute pertains to rival claims over the name 'All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam' (AIADMK) and its reserved symbol 'Two Leaves' between two factions, with the Election Commission having accepted the claim of one group. The interim relief is granted to the other group pending final decision. (Paras 2, 11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Supreme Court can entertain a miscellaneous application in a disposed of special leave petition for interim directions regarding allotment of election symbol and party name, pending final adjudication of the main writ petition before the High Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the miscellaneous application and directed the Election Commission of India to pass an appropriate order permitting the applicant (T.T.V. Dhinakaran) and his group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and name of their choice for the upcoming by-election to the Thiruvarur Assembly constituency, as an interim measure, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in the main writ petition pending before the Delhi High Court. The Court clarified that this direction is not an expression on the merits of the dispute and that the High Court should decide the main writ petition expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Maintainability of application in disposed of SLP
  • Liberty granted by court
  • Interim arrangement for election symbol and party name
  • Functus officio doctrine
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (2) 1

M.A. No.31 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.7258 of 2018

2019-01-11

A.M. Khanwilkar

Edapaddi K. Palaniswami

T.T.V. Dhinakaran & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Miscellaneous application in disposed of special leave petition seeking interim directions for allotment of election symbol and party name.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the Election Commission of India to permit the applicant and his group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and name of their choice for upcoming elections during pendency of the writ petition before the High Court.

Filing Reason

By-election to Thiruvarur Assembly constituency was notified on 31 December 2018, and the applicant sought interim relief similar to that granted by the Single Judge of the High Court, which was kept in abeyance by the Supreme Court.

Previous Decisions

The Single Judge of the Delhi High Court allowed the interim application on 9 March 2018, directing ECI to permit the applicant's group to use a common symbol and name. The Supreme Court, on 28 March 2018, kept that order in abeyance and disposed of the SLP with liberty to approach in case of new election notification.

Issues

Whether the miscellaneous application is maintainable in a disposed of special leave petition. Whether the applicant is entitled to interim relief for allotment of election symbol and party name pending final adjudication of the main writ petition.

Submissions/Arguments

Respondents argued that the SLP having been disposed of, the Court has become functus officio and cannot entertain the application; the election notification has been rescinded; the applicant should approach the High Court. Applicant argued that liberty was granted by the Court to approach in case of new election notification; the writ petition is still pending; the Single Judge's order was not challenged by ECI; similar relief is necessary for upcoming elections.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a court expressly grants liberty to parties to approach it in the event of a specified contingency, the court retains jurisdiction to entertain an application for interim relief even after the main proceeding is disposed of, and such application is maintainable. The court may grant interim relief to protect the rights of parties pending final adjudication, especially when the main matter is still pending before a lower court and the interim relief was previously granted but kept in abeyance due to changed circumstances.

Judgment Excerpts

On a plain reading of the order passed by this Court on 28th March, 2018... it is crystal clear that this Court did not examine the merit of the judgment under appeal at all. The fact that the writ petition is still pending before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court would certainly be no impediment for the parties to approach this Court in light of the liberty granted to them in terms of our order dated 28th March, 2018. We direct the Election Commission of India to pass an appropriate order permitting the applicant and his group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and also permit them to use the name of their choice in the upcoming by-election to the Thiruvarur Assembly constituency.

Procedural History

The Election Commission of India decided on 23 November 2017 that the group led by E. Madhusudhanan and Edapaddi K. Palaniswami was entitled to use the AIADMK party name and 'Two Leaves' symbol. T.T.V. Dhinakaran challenged this decision in Writ Petition (Civil) No.10728 of 2017 before the Delhi High Court. During pendency, an interim application (C.M. No.2994/2018) was filed seeking permission to use a common symbol and name for local body elections. The Single Judge allowed the application on 9 March 2018. Edapaddi K. Palaniswami filed SLP(C) No.7258 of 2018 against that order. The Supreme Court disposed of the SLP on 28 March 2018, keeping the interim order in abeyance, directing expeditious hearing of the writ petition, and granting liberty to approach in case of new election notification. On 31 December 2018, ECI notified a by-election for Thiruvarur constituency. T.T.V. Dhinakaran filed the present miscellaneous application on 2 January 2019 seeking similar interim relief.

Acts & Sections

  • Representation of the People Act, 1951:
  • Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Interim Relief for Political Group in Symbol Dispute Pending Final Adjudication. The Court directed the Election Commission to permit the applicant group to use a common symbol and name for upcoming elections, without prejudice t...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Attempt to Murder and Arms Act Case Based on Concurrent Factual Findings. Intent to Kill Under Section 307 IPC Inferred from Circumstances Including Pointing Pistol and Threat, and Misuse of Licensed Wea...