Case Note & Summary
The Supreme Court was hearing a miscellaneous application filed by T.T.V. Dhinakaran (TTVD), respondent No.1 in a disposed of special leave petition, seeking interim directions for allotment of an election symbol and party name for upcoming elections. The background involves a dispute between two factions of the AIADMK political party in Tamil Nadu. The Election Commission of India (ECI) had, by its decision dated 23 November 2017, accepted the claim of the group led by E. Madhusudhanan (EM) and Edapaddi K. Palaniswami (EKP) to use the party name 'AIADMK' and its reserved symbol 'Two Leaves', rejecting the claim of the group led by V.K. Sasikala (VKS) and TTVD. TTVD challenged this decision before the Delhi High Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.10728 of 2017, which is still pending. During the pendency of the writ petition, when local body elections were announced, TTVD moved an interim application (C.M. No.2994/2018) seeking permission to use a common symbol and name. The Single Judge of the High Court allowed the application on 9 March 2018, directing ECI to permit TTVD's group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and a name of their choice. EKP, representing the other faction, filed SLP(C) No.7258 of 2018 against this interim order. On 28 March 2018, the Supreme Court disposed of the SLP without examining merits, keeping the Single Judge's interim order in abeyance, directing the High Court to expedite the main writ petition, and granting liberty to parties to approach the Court if any new election notification was issued. Subsequently, on 31 December 2018, ECI notified a by-election for the Thiruvarur Assembly constituency, prompting TTVD to file the present miscellaneous application on 2 January 2019, seeking similar interim relief. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the application was not maintainable as the SLP was disposed of and the Court had become functus officio. The Supreme Court rejected this objection, holding that the liberty granted in the order of 28 March 2018 expressly allowed parties to approach the Court in the event of a new election notification, and dismissing the application would trivialize that liberty. The Court noted that the writ petition was still pending before the High Court and that the Single Judge's interim order had not been independently challenged by the ECI. The Court directed ECI to pass an appropriate order permitting TTVD and his group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and a name of their choice for the upcoming by-election, as an interim measure, without prejudice to the rights of parties in the main writ petition. The Court clarified that this direction was not an expression on the merits of the dispute and that the High Court should decide the main writ petition expeditiously.
Headnote
A) Civil Procedure - Maintainability of Application in Disposed of SLP - Liberty Granted by Court - The Supreme Court held that where liberty is expressly reserved in the order disposing of the SLP, the Court retains jurisdiction to entertain a subsequent application for interim relief, even though the SLP is disposed of, to prevent trivializing the spirit of the liberty granted. (Paras 8-10) B) Election Law - Interim Arrangement for Symbol and Name - Pending Final Adjudication - The Court directed the Election Commission to pass an appropriate order permitting the applicant and his group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and name of their choice for upcoming elections, as an interim measure, without prejudice to the rights of parties in the main writ petition. (Paras 11-12) C) Election Law - Symbol Dispute - Group Claim - The dispute pertains to rival claims over the name 'All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam' (AIADMK) and its reserved symbol 'Two Leaves' between two factions, with the Election Commission having accepted the claim of one group. The interim relief is granted to the other group pending final decision. (Paras 2, 11)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the Supreme Court can entertain a miscellaneous application in a disposed of special leave petition for interim directions regarding allotment of election symbol and party name, pending final adjudication of the main writ petition before the High Court.
Final Decision
The Supreme Court allowed the miscellaneous application and directed the Election Commission of India to pass an appropriate order permitting the applicant (T.T.V. Dhinakaran) and his group to use a common symbol (preferably 'Pressure Cooker') and name of their choice for the upcoming by-election to the Thiruvarur Assembly constituency, as an interim measure, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in the main writ petition pending before the Delhi High Court. The Court clarified that this direction is not an expression on the merits of the dispute and that the High Court should decide the main writ petition expeditiously.
Law Points
- Maintainability of application in disposed of SLP
- Liberty granted by court
- Interim arrangement for election symbol and party name
- Functus officio doctrine



