Supreme Court Directs Protection of Sacred Groves/Orans in Rajasthan as Deemed Forests Under Forest Conservation Act, 1980. Recognizes Ecological and Cultural Significance of Community-Conserved Forests and Balances Community Rights with Conservation Goals.

  • 530
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India was hearing an interlocutory application in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India writ petition, which concerns forest conservation across India. The application sought classification of sacred groves known as Orans in Rajasthan as 'deemed forests' under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. The background includes the Court's landmark 1996 judgment holding that the FC Act applies to all forests regardless of classification, and directing states to identify forests through expert committees. In compliance, Rajasthan constituted the Kapoor Committee, which identified sacred groves including Orans as forests but applied a minimum area and tree density criteria. The Central Empowered Committee found this inconsistent with the Court's orders. The Court examined the ecological and cultural significance of Orans, noting they are community-protected forests with deep religious and cultural roots, providing livelihood, grazing, water, and biodiversity conservation in arid regions. The Court considered submissions from the amicus curiae emphasizing community rights and conservation goals, and from the State of Rajasthan. The Court held that Orans are indeed forests under the FC Act and must be protected as deemed forests. It issued directions for their identification, mapping, and regulation, balancing conservation with sustainable community use. The judgment underscores the importance of sacred groves in India's biodiversity and cultural heritage, and aligns with international law principles on indigenous and community conserved areas.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Forest Conservation - Deemed Forests - Sacred Groves/Orans - Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - The Court considered whether sacred groves known as Orans in Rajasthan qualify as 'deemed forests' under the FC Act. Held that Orans, being community-protected forests with ecological and cultural significance, fall within the definition of forests as interpreted in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India, and must be classified as deemed forests for conservation purposes (Paras 14-15).

B) Environmental Law - Community Rights - Conservation - Sacred Groves - Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - The Court examined the balance between community rights and conservation goals in protecting Orans. Held that while Orans serve as common property resources for grazing and livelihood, their conservation is paramount, and any use must be sustainable and regulated to prevent degradation (Paras 18-21).

C) International Law - Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas - Sacred Natural Sites - Convention on Biological Diversity - The Court referred to international law principles recognizing sacred natural sites and community conserved areas. Held that India's obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity support the protection of sacred groves as important biodiversity reservoirs (Paras 22-24).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether sacred groves/Orans in Rajasthan should be classified as 'deemed forests' under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and what directions are necessary for their protection.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed that sacred groves/Orans in Rajasthan be classified as 'deemed forests' under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and issued directions for their identification, mapping, and regulation to ensure conservation while allowing sustainable community use.

Law Points

  • Forest Conservation Act
  • 1980 applies to all forests irrespective of classification
  • sacred groves/Orans are deemed forests
  • community rights and conservation goals must be balanced
  • international law principles on indigenous and community conserved areas are relevant
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (SC) (12) 181

IA No(s). 41723 of 2022 in Writ Petition(Civil) No(s). 202 of 1995

2024-12-18

Mehta, J.

2024 INSC 997

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Interlocutory application in a public interest writ petition seeking protection of forests across India, specifically concerning classification of sacred groves/Orans in Rajasthan as deemed forests.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought classification of sacred groves in Rajasthan as 'deemed forests' under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

Filing Reason

To ensure legal protection of sacred groves/Orans which are community-protected forests with ecological and cultural significance but were not being classified as forests under state criteria.

Previous Decisions

The Supreme Court in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1997) held that Forest Conservation Act applies to all forests irrespective of classification. The Kapoor Committee in Rajasthan identified sacred groves but applied a minimum area and tree density criteria, which was found inconsistent by the Central Empowered Committee.

Issues

Whether sacred groves/Orans in Rajasthan qualify as 'deemed forests' under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. What directions are necessary to protect these sacred groves while balancing community rights and conservation goals.

Submissions/Arguments

Amicus curiae argued for recognition of community rights and involvement in conservation, emphasizing the ecological and cultural significance of Orans. State of Rajasthan submitted its policy framework and recommendations of the Central Empowered Committee.

Ratio Decidendi

Sacred groves/Orans, being community-protected forests with ecological and cultural significance, fall within the definition of 'forests' under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 as interpreted in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India, and must be protected as deemed forests. Conservation goals must be balanced with community rights to ensure sustainable use.

Judgment Excerpts

This Court, in its judgment dated 12.12.1996 in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Others, held that the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 is applicable to all forests, irrespective of their classification, and directed State Governments to identify forests through expert committees. The Kapoor Committee identified sacred groves, such as Orans, Bundhs, and Dev-vans, for classification as ‘forests.’

Procedural History

The Supreme Court in 1996 in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India held that the Forest Conservation Act applies to all forests and directed states to identify forests. Rajasthan constituted the Kapoor Committee which submitted its report in 2004 identifying sacred groves but with criteria. The Central Empowered Committee found the criteria inconsistent. Subsequently, I.A. No. 1254 was filed seeking classification of sacred groves as deemed forests. The present I.A. No. 41723 of 2022 was filed by Aman Singh seeking similar relief.

Acts & Sections

  • Forest Conservation Act, 1980:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition by Owner of Motorcycle in Confiscation Proceeding Under Karnataka Excise Act Due to Prior Acquittal in Criminal Case. The Court Held That an Order of Confiscation Cannot Stand When the Accused Has Been...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order Against Elected Directors of Cooperative Society for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Suspension Order Issued Under Section 29C of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 Set Asid...