Search Results for "circumstantial evidence"

3933 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3933 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and House Trespass in Axe Attack on Elderly Woman. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Life Sentence Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Bajirao @ Baburao Maraskolhe, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Trial No.47 of 2009 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence Fails as Chain of Circumstances Not Complete Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vilas Govinda Pradhan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his wife, Anita @ Pinky, under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Confirmed as Chain of Circumstances Complete and False Explanation Considered.

The appellant, Maruti s/o Mahadeo Raut, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife and sentenced to lif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Proof of Homicidal Death and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 498A, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish foundational facts and chain of circumstances was incomplete.

The appellant, Santosh Ramchandra Sahare, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of his wife Sangita under Section 302 IPC, cruelty under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. The court held that the failure of the appellants to explain the death of the deceased after being last seen together led to an inference of guilt under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.

The appellants, Santosh Tanbaji Durge and Raju @ Rajesh Vasanta Gudapwar, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 364, 302, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by single neck press without premeditation or intention to kill.

The appellant, Sagar Bhagwat Gawande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon for the murder of his wife Archana under Section 302 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Doubtful Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The appellant, Panjab Onkarrao Sagole, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur, for the murder of his brother Avinash under Section 3...