Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by single neck press without premeditation or intention to kill.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 45
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sagar Bhagwat Gawande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon for the murder of his wife Archana under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was that the appellant and his family members ill-treated Archana for dowry, and on the night of 2 October 2012, the appellant quarrelled with her and pressed her neck, causing her death. The appellant informed the police and the victim's father about the incident. The trial court convicted the appellant based on circumstantial evidence and the appellant's own statement. On appeal, the Bombay High Court examined the evidence and found that the prosecution failed to prove the dowry demand as a motive for murder. The court noted that the appellant had informed the police immediately and there was no premeditation. The medical evidence showed that death was caused by asphyxia due to pressure on the neck, but there was no intention to kill. The court held that the offence falls under Section 304 Part I IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) as the act was done with the knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without intention to cause death. The court set aside the conviction under Section 302 IPC and convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part I IPC, sentencing him to the period already undergone (about 5 years) and reducing the fine. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Conviction set aside - Death caused by pressing neck during quarrel - No premeditation or intention to kill - Offence falls under Section 304 Part I IPC - Held that the act was done with knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without intention to cause death (Paras 1-20).

B) Criminal Law - Dowry Death - Section 304B IPC - Not applicable - Demand of money not proved as dowry demand - No evidence of cruelty or harassment soon before death - Held that ingredients of Section 304B not satisfied (Paras 2-10).

C) Criminal Law - Evidence - Circumstantial Evidence - Inconsistencies in prosecution case - Benefit of doubt given - Held that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 15-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable or whether the offence falls under a lesser degree of culpable homicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part I IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for the period already undergone (about 5 years) and fine of Rs.500/- with default sentence of six months.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part I IPC
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Culpable Homicide
  • Murder
  • Intention
  • Knowledge
  • Dowry Death
  • Section 304B IPC
  • Section 498A IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (02) 132

Criminal Appeal No.101 of 2017

2018-02-28

R.K. Deshpande, M.G. Giratkar

Mr. S.D. Chande holding for Dr. U.K. Kalsi for Appellant, Ms. T.H. Udeshi, A.P.P. for Respondent/State

Sagar Bhagwat Gawande

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his wife; he challenged the conviction on grounds of lack of intent and insufficient evidence.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable? Whether the offence falls under Section 304 Part I or Part II IPC? Whether the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that there was no intention to kill, only a quarrel leading to pressing neck, and that he immediately informed police and family. Prosecution argued that the act of pressing neck with knowledge of likely death amounts to murder, and that dowry demand was motive.

Ratio Decidendi

The act of pressing the neck during a quarrel, without premeditation or intention to cause death, but with knowledge that it was likely to cause death, constitutes culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, not murder under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Appellant has challenged the Judgment of conviction awarded by Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code... The act of pressing the neck was done in a sudden quarrel without premeditation and without intention to cause death.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC. Appellant filed appeal in High Court. High Court partly allowed appeal, convicting under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304 Part I, 304 Part II, 304B, 498A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as death caused by single neck press without premeditation or intention to kill.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Sharebroker in Time-Barred Claim Dispute. Limitation Period for Quarterly Settlement Runs from End of Quarter Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.