Search Results for "Service Contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Service Contract"

4165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4165 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability on Liaison Office Activities in India Under Income Tax Act, 1961 and DTAA. Income from printing and dispatching cheques in India through liaison offices constitutes business connection and permanent establishment, making profits attributable to such activities taxable in India.

24 Apr 2020

The respondent, U.A.E. Exchange Centre, a company incorporated in the United Arab Emirates, provided remittance services for transferring amounts from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL and Upholds Award of Emergency Medical Services Tender to Consortium. Court Finds No Irregularities in Tender Process; Holds that PIL Was Not Bona Fide and Should Be Proceeded Suo Motu.

8 Apr 2025

The matter involved a public interest litigation (PIL) and a connected writ petition arising from a tender for the Maharashtra Emergency Medical Servi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in E-Auction Dispute Due to Technical Glitch and Lack of Arbitrariness. Connectivity failure at service provider's end justified resumption of auction; High Court's interference in commercial decision set aside.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (BCCL) against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had quashed the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Required Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court clarified that under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, sanction is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and set aside the trial court's order directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga (Crl.RP No.659/2008) and another by the a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Mandatory Before Cognizance Can Be Taken by Special Judge.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in Special ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act Must Be Obtained Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court held that sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and the Special Judge erred in directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused's Revision Petition in Prevention of Corruption Act Case — Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction Set Aside. Sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with by the Special Judge.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

18 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Tender by Western Coalfields Limited. Tender cancellation upheld as employer has discretion to cancel tender before issuance of purchase order, and no concluded contract exists.

5 Jan 2023

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by successful bidders challenging the cancellation of a global tender issued by Western Coalfields Limi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession or ouster, and the suit for partition was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

8 Jun 2026

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant no. 2 (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs) against the judgment and decr...

78 79 80 81 82

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)