Search Results for "Patna High Court"

893 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 893 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Gratuity Order; Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Confined to Specific Grounds and Does Not Extend to Alleged Illegal Appointment.

The dispute arose under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, where an employee of Air India Ltd., who had served for 29 years, was dismissed from servic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Illicit Relationship. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for killing deceased due to illicit relationship with his wife; conviction based on motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Surendra Sribali Sahu, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Pramod Amrit Ram. The prosecution case was that the appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute Over Member Access to Documents. Right of Members to Inspect and Obtain Copies of Society Records Under Section 147 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 is a Statutory Right Not Subject to Unreasonable Restrictions.

The appellant, Sadashivrao Mandlik Kagal Taluka Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a specified cooperative society engaged in sugar manufacturing, appeale...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Money Recovery Suit Due to Non-Proving of Document Contents. Appellate Court erred in reversing trial court's finding that contents of document dated 21st July 1998 were not proved under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the original defendant (Ashok Mohanlal Poddar) agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 22(c) and 29 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove supply or conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ajay Kumar Gupta, was accused no.2 in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The prosecution...