Search Results for "Deemed withdrawal"

1075 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1075 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Bank Employee's Petition Against Unilateral Withholding of Pension. Pension is a property right and cannot be stopped without show cause notice or disciplinary proceedings under Bank of Maharashtra Pension Regulations.

The petitioner, Devanand s/o Galomal Nichwani, was a computer operator/clerk at Bank of Maharashtra, Jaripatka Branch, Nagpur. He opted for voluntary ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion Despite Prior Resignation. Resignation Not Effective Until Approval by Panchayat Samiti, No Confidence Motion Validly Passed Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Chandrakant Bapuso Rugge, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat, Tamdalge. He tendered his resignation on 17 August 2012, addressed to the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Port Trust as Barred by Limitation Under Section 120 of Major Port Trust Act, 1963. Suit filed beyond six months from accrual of cause of action is not maintainable.

The plaintiff, American President Lines Ltd. and others, filed a suit against the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay (BPT) and Nahar Industrial E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs.51 Crores with Interest. Facility Agreement and Guarantee Enforced; No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Reid & Taylor (I) Limited, S.Kumars Nationwide Ltd., and Nitin S. Kasliwal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and ...