Bombay High Court Allows Ayurvedic Colleges to Conduct Common Entrance Test Through AMUPMDC in Challenge to Centralized Admission Orders. Unaided Private Ayurvedic Medical Colleges Held Entitled to Conduct Own Admission Process Under Article 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 71
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Association of Management of Ayurvedic Medical Colleges Maharashtra, representing 44 private unaided Ayurvedic colleges, challenged orders passed by the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (respondent no.2) and the Pravesh Niyantran Samiti (respondent no.3) directing the colleges to participate in the centralized admission process (CAP) conducted by the State or the University for admission to undergraduate and postgraduate courses. The petitioner contended that the colleges had decided to conduct a common entrance test through the Association of Management of Unaided Private Medical and Dental Colleges (AMUPMDC), which was permissible under the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 and the regulations framed thereunder. The respondents argued that the colleges must follow the centralized process to ensure transparency and merit. The court, relying on the Supreme Court's decisions in T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka and P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra, held that unaided private professional institutions have the right to admit students through their own admission process, including a common entrance test conducted by an association of colleges, as long as merit is maintained. The impugned orders were quashed and set aside, and the respondents were directed not to interfere with the admission process conducted by the petitioner through AMUPMDC for the academic year 2015-2016.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right of Unaided Private Professional Institutions - Admission Process - Articles 19(1)(g) and 26 of the Constitution of India - Unaided private Ayurvedic medical colleges have the right to admit students through their own common entrance test conducted by an association of colleges, subject to fulfilling statutory requirements and maintaining merit. The court held that the impugned orders directing the colleges to participate in the centralized admission process of the State or University were unsustainable. (Paras 2-10)

B) Education Law - Ayurvedic Medical Education - Admission Procedure - Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, Section 3 - The Central Council of Indian Medicine (CCIM) regulations do not mandate that admissions must be through a single centralized process by the State or University; the colleges can adopt a common entrance test through their own association. (Paras 4-8)

C) Administrative Law - Quasi-Judicial Orders - Validity - The orders passed by the University and the Pravesh Niyantran Samiti (PNS) were set aside as they were contrary to the legal position settled by the Supreme Court regarding the autonomy of unaided private institutions. (Paras 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent authorities can compel the petitioner association of unaided Ayurvedic medical colleges to admit students through a centralized admission process conducted by the State or the University, or whether the colleges are entitled to conduct their own common entrance test through AMUPMDC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned orders passed by respondent nos. 2 and 3 are quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed not to interfere with the admission process conducted by the petitioner through AMUPMDC for the academic year 2015-2016. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Admission to unaided private professional colleges
  • autonomy of private unaided institutions
  • common entrance test
  • Indian Medicine Central Council Act 1970
  • Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (05) 31

Writ Petition No. 3424 of 2015

2015-05-07

Anoop V. Mohta, K. R. Shriram

Mr. V. M. Thorat i/by Mr. M. V. Thorat for the petitioner, Mr. C. P. Yadav, AGP for respondent No.1, Mr. S.P. Khedekar for respondent No.3, Mr. R.A. Rodrigues i/by Mr. Y. R. Singh for respondent No.4, Ms. Chandana Salgaonkar for respondent No.5

Association of Management of Ayurvedic Medical Colleges Maharashtra

State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Pravesh Niyantran Samiti, Central Council of Indian Medicine, Association of Managements of Unaided Private Medical & Dental Colleges Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging orders of Maharashtra University of Health Sciences and Pravesh Niyantran Samiti directing unaided Ayurvedic colleges to participate in centralized admission process.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of impugned orders and direction to respondents not to interfere with the common entrance test conducted by the petitioner through AMUPMDC.

Filing Reason

The respondent authorities passed orders compelling the petitioner's member colleges to admit students through a centralized admission process, contrary to their decision to conduct a common entrance test through AMUPMDC.

Issues

Whether the impugned orders directing the petitioner's member colleges to participate in the centralized admission process are valid. Whether unaided private Ayurvedic medical colleges have the right to conduct their own common entrance test through an association.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the colleges have the right to admit students through their own common entrance test as per Supreme Court judgments and CCIM regulations. Respondents argued that the centralized process ensures transparency and merit, and the colleges must follow it.

Ratio Decidendi

Unaided private professional institutions have the right to admit students through their own admission process, including a common entrance test conducted by an association of colleges, as long as merit is maintained. The State or University cannot compel them to participate in a centralized admission process.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner is Association of Management of Ayurvedic Medical Colleges of Maharashtra. The impugned orders are passed by Respondent nos. 2 and 3. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an urgent basis. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith, and the petition was heard finally by consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970: Section 3
  • Bombay Societies Act, 1860:
  • Constitution of India: Articles 19(1)(g), 26
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Arrears of Rent and Bonafide Requirement Not Proven. Tenant's Deposit of Standard Rent and Continued Business Use Defeated Claims Under Bombay Rent Act.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank and Sugar Factory's Petitions Challenging Auction of Cooperative Sugar Factory Assets. Held that the Bank as a secured creditor has a paramount charge over the property and the auction sale cannot be set aside after c...