Search Results for "vacancy filling"

405 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 405 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Decision Setting Aside Promotion of Junior NT(C) Candidate and Directing Promotion of Senior SC Candidate to ST Vacancy. Reservation interchangeability between SC and ST categories applied to fill ST vacancy in promotion post.

The case involves two writ petitions challenging a common judgment of the School Tribunal dated 19 April 2018. The Tribunal had set aside the promotio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Home University Reservation in Technical Courses. Rules 9(3)(c), 9(3)(d) and 13 of Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2017 held intra vires the Act and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 15(4) and 29(2).

The petitioners, eight students from various districts in Maharashtra, filed a writ petition challenging Rules 9(3)(c), 9(3)(d) and 13 of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Co-option of Member in APMC for Violation of Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Failure to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Object Renders Co-option Invalid.

The petitioners, Sadashiv Pandurang Patil and Audumbar Gorakh More, were members of the Karmala Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). They cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Disqualification of MLA in Election Law Case — Conviction Does Not Trigger Disqualification Under Section 8(3) of Representation of the People Act, 1951, When Sentence Is Suspended Pending Appeal.

The petitioner, Sanjay Narayanrao Meshram, a citizen of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Government Engineer Seeking Antedated Promotion. Petitioner's claim for regular promotion from 2004 rejected as ad-hoc promotion in 2005 did not confer right to retrospective regularisation.

The petitioner, Shri S. Lekshmanan, was appointed as Junior Engineer (Electrical) on 04.06.1979 and promoted to Assistant Engineer on 15.07.1996. He c...