Search Results for "securitisation company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "securitisation company"

198 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 198 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Awards Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act -- Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction in Banking Dispute with Co-operative Bank -- No Conflict Found with SARFAESI Act or RDB Act

12 Feb 2026

The High Court dismissed two Commercial Arbitration Petitions challenging arbitral awards passed by an Arbitrator appointed under Section 84 of Multi-...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

3 Dec 2021

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds. Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 as Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Authority Over Securitisation Matters, Despite Allegations of Fraud in Assignment Agreement.

26 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a loan agreement dated 26.07.2011, where the appellant acted as a guarantor for a corporate debtor. After the corporate debtor ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Under IBC, Holds Prior Consent Under Section 16G of Tea Act Required for Initiation of CIRP Against Tea Gardens Under Central Government Management. The court ruled that the Tea Act, 1953, being a special legislation, requires prior consent of the Central Government for initiating insolvency proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC against a corporate debtor whose tea gardens are under government management.

4 Oct 2019

The case involves a dispute between Duncans Industries Ltd. (the appellant/corporate debtor) and A. J. Agrochem (the respondent/operational creditor) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Time-Bound Disposal of Section 14 SARFAESI Application by Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. Secured Creditor's Right to Expeditious Possession of Secured Assets Upheld Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

22 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Capital First Ltd., a secured creditor under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Int...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Alternative Remedy of Appeal Under Section 17(7) Available. Petitioners, as tenants of secured asset, cannot bypass statutory appellate remedy by invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

8 Aug 2017

The petitioners, who were tenants of a property that was a secured asset of the respondent HDB Financial Services Ltd., filed securitisation applicati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Auction Sale Against Personal Guarantors. Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Not Exhausted; Auction Sale Confirmed and Sale Certificate Issued.

25 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Utkarsh Cement Sales Pvt. Ltd. and its directors/guarantors, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs District Magistrate to Dispose of SARFAESI Section 14 Application Within Statutory Time Limit — Amendment (44 of 2016) Mandates 30-Day Disposal. The court held that the District Magistrate must pass an order on an application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act within 30 days, extendable to 60 days, and the amendment applies to pending proceedings.

21 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, a financial institution registered under the SARFAESI Act, filed a writ petition befor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Trial Court's Jurisdiction Ruling in SARFAESI Act Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Permanent Injunction Against Re-auction of Mortgaged Property Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions.

16 Apr 2015

The respondent, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1756 of 2014 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the applicant bank from re-auc...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)